The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
A talented individual, be it in any field like music, drama or dance are recognized by his or her ardent followers of that generation as well as the generations that follow. If an individual is truly talented then it will most certainly mean that he will have followers and the critics of those times will also agree with the fact that a musician was a talented individual. Hence, I disagree with the fact that a musician will be correctly assessed only after he has been dead for generations.
Firstly, the critics are sound individuals whose judgement is respected by all the individuals in a society. They have been assigned the status of a critic because these people are at the epitome of the field wherein, they pass their reviews. They have been put onto that spot due to their sound understanding of the field as well as the impartial judgement they pass. These individuals are by no means the ardent followers of a particular musician or his or her work. They are at the position of critic to discuss upon the fallacies of a particular artist. If an individual is talented and truly a great musician, he or she will preserve this status for generations to come. On the contrary, if the musician was not talented, the critics of that generation would have refused to recognize a person as an accomplished musician.
Secondly, the fame that a musician or any artist receives from his or her followers is due to the fact that they truly possess an acumen for the field they are present in. Present day individuals do not blindly support an artist. They do so because of the musical prowess an individual possesses. Talented individuals become part of the field wherein they excel. They get the fame and the stardom which comes along with it. They are also blessed with a huge fan-base. These fans are not blind or deaf to not look at the shortcomings of an individual. As it is said, a truly talented individual is forever remembered for his or her work, whereas an individual with little to no talent falls into oblivion.
Additionally, as the generations keep on evolving, their predilection for a particular form of music sways from one form to another. It is not appropriate to let the future generations judge or assess the musician of bygone years. The possibility of the new generations, not recognizing the true essence of the music is highly probable. Youngsters currently have a liking for rock music, but their predecessors had a liking for classical music. The youngsters will not truly appreciate the talent of the singers from the bygone era. This would be an unjust assessment of the talent of a musician form the past years.
Therefore, I strongly oppose the above given statement that a musician can be assessed accurately only after he or she has been dead for several generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...nd the critics of those times will also agree with the fact that a musician was a talented individual. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...ian was a talented individual. Hence, I disagree with the fact that a musician will be correctly assessed o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7864476386 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80672089085 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431211498973 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6493833496 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.24 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.48 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294782101744 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088441335062 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830926042917 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193900205293 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595944601102 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.