The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
With the latest technologies today, social media is a great platform for anyone to showcase their talent. It only takes a few clicks and probably seconds after, that the post goes completely viral all over the internet gathers innumerous likes or dislikes. However, to be judge of the real talent of a person is beyond just the popularity of the individual and hence must be evaluated on factors germane to his or her profession.
To state that the real talent of a popular musician can be accurately assessed only after the death of the individual is far-fetched. As stated earlier, popularity and talent are two different sides of the same coin. For example, consider Lil Wayne or Honey Singh, both rappers, one based out of U.S. and the other from India. Their popularity knows no bounds. Their music is mainly a collection of musical screed on a particular topic which somehow the deranged youth of the country are highly attracted to. However, that doesn't define their degree of talent. Yes , it does speak of their talent to engage and attract crowds to their art but when considering their musical talent - not really. Hence, it would be moot to state that the real talent could be assessed after their death while it can be very well evaluated at this point in time.
Another reason to disagree with the stated prompt is that an honest assessment should be independent of fame. If the artist is truly talented, he os she must be approbated for the same irrespective of the fame. The critics must realise and consider the technicalities of the art while assessing any musician. Consider the example of Shreya Ghoshal, an enormously talented singer in the Bollywood industry. Well, her works are of a wide range in variety and she is one of the best singers in the country. Nevertheless, this status has not been accorded to her owing to her popularity among the masses but her talent and versatility as a singer. Hence, awaiting the death of an artist in order for the fame to die down and then assess their talent is foolhardy.
I, however, do concede that talent and popularity go hand in hand and that one is popular probably because he or she is talented. But, in today's time, where people are so capricious and reactive to every update on social media, it's easy to like or dislike something in a moment's time. To actually evaluate the worth of an artisr would need careful assessment by the respective critics who must consider the weighing in factors while doing so.
Hence, I would like to conclude by saying, the real talent of a popular musician can be assessed while he or she is very much alive based on a series of key factors the critics deem right keeping in mind , popularity should not be at the top of that list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... are highly attracted to. However, that doesnt define their degree of talent. Yes , it...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oesnt define their degree of talent. Yes , it does speak of their talent to engage...
^^
Line 9, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s the critics deem right keeping in mind , popularity should not be at the top of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, then, well, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69709543568 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53568515872 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51244813278 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0649642503 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33553822329 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941304538678 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731859782442 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182733952655 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609224265933 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.