The right to bear arms is not the direct cause of the level of violence in a country
There are a lot coutries that have hight level of violence. Government in these countries often faced the question about the right to bear arms. I am strongly convinced that the right to bear arms does not influence the level of violence.
The main reason for my point of view is that the strict laws are the most important factor of violence in the country. People will think twice before commit a crime if they know that the punishment is very strict. There are examples in other country where are used strict laws. For instance, the thief’s arm will be cut in some Arabic countries for theft. This shows good results: the level of theft is very low. Therefore, it is very important to have strick laws because they influence the violence in a country.
Another reason for my point of view is that the situationt in the country in the whole is the direct cause of the level of violence in a country. There are a lot of poor countries, where unemployment is in a high level. People from these countries try live and their way for finding food often related with crimes. As a result, the level of violence is a very high. Consequently, this factof also influence the violence in a country.
On the other hand, the right to bear arms could be the cause of violence. The person that have gun can use it not only for deffence but also to commit a crime. Moreover, it is possible that the insane person has the right to bear arms and the results of this situation could be terrible. There are a lot of examples of using arms in a bad way in the USA. As a result, common people suffer. However, it is possible to check all people that want to have this right. This strict check can improve the situation and people will use the arms only for deffence.
It has been seen that there are a lot of other mor important factors influence the level of violence in a country. Firsty, it is the punishment that must be very strick. Secondary, it is the situation in the country. Government have to improve it because people that do not have food are ready to commin a crime. Of course, the right to bear arms is useful if people who has it is normal. Government have to strictly check all people who want to have arms. All these measures could influence the level of violence in a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reason for my point of view is that the strict laws are the most important facto...
^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arm will be cut in some Arabic countries for theft. This shows good results: the ...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gunned'.
Suggestion: gunned
...cause of violence. The person that have gun can use it not only for deffence but al...
^^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ere are a lot of examples of using arms in a bad way in the USA. As a result, common people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...he situation in the country. Government have to improve it because people that do no...
^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...people who has it is normal. Government have to strictly check all people who want ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ormal. Government have to strictly check all people who want to have arms. All th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'of course', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25321888412 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.165236051502 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0600858369099 0.0880659088768 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.049356223176 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0321888412017 0.0444667217837 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12017167382 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0236051502146 0.0406280797675 58% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.36850334903 2.79330140395 85% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278969957082 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.137339055794 0.0997080785238 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.019313304721 0.0249443105267 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.019313304721 0.0148568991511 130% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2286.0 2732.02544248 84% => OK
No of words: 421.0 452.878318584 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42992874109 6.0361032391 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.266033254157 0.366273622748 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.190023752969 0.280924506359 68% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142517814727 0.200843997647 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0807600950119 0.132149295362 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36850334903 2.79330140395 85% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 219.290929204 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.372921615202 0.48968727796 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.9625318782 55.4138127331 72% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0357142857 23.380412469 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9291854202 59.4972553346 42% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6428571429 141.124799967 58% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0357142857 23.380412469 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 34.0380895826 51.4728631049 66% => OK
Elegance: 1.60869565217 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.714220645543 0.391690518653 182% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111981964952 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0735908353515 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489196299624 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150232058039 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.270684694763 0.161403998019 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181471729142 0.0892212321368 203% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.486107654701 0.385218514788 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109475662747 0.0692045440612 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.539719792873 0.275328986314 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569549065572 0.0653680567796 87% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.30420353982 339% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.