Scandals are useful because they focus on attention on problems in a way that no speakers and reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Are scandals useful in calling attention to our problems more than speakers and reformer do, as statement suggests? I agree that in many cases the scandals serves to throw lights on societal and national level problems, but we should not outweigh the influence of reformers and motivational speakers they have had on solving grave issues of the society. Hence, I would be substantiating my position in subsequent passages.
Scandals, in fact, serve to call our attention to pervasive social and national level problems that we generally are not aware, and are efficacious to lead to social change. For instance, let us take an example of the Watergate Scandal. Initially, it is regarded as one of underhanded campaign tactics. Surprisingly, further investigation led to resignation of contemporary state head: Richard Nixon. Furthermore, this scandal acts a caveat to anyone in public life of the dangers of being too driven by the power to not notice the moral, ethical and legal implication of what you are doing. Clearly, this scandal gave high sign for the public to carefully scrutinize the behaviours of their elected public officials; also, for public officials to maintain their moral and ethical standards while serving for the public.
Similarly, scandals have brought the people to unite together and stand up against the injustice prevailing in the society. To exemplify the stated opinion let us take an example of burgeoning number of sexual violence’s in Nepal. Recently in few years, the numbered of sexual assault cases registered is quiet shocking. Lots of complains from various communities has harboured suspicions about national security among the individuals. Every individual, however, reunited from the local levels to raise their voice against injustice and has brought significant change too. Indeed, scandals have changed the way how people interact with the social problems; moreover, inspired them to unite together and raise their voice against injustice prevailing around society, community and nation.
On the flip side, reformer and motivational speakers have played the part to resolve various social problems. To illustrate, let us take an example of Anuradha Koirala, one of the active reformer currently in Nepal. She along with her team has been involved in providing assist to the victims of the girl trafficking through her reputed organization: Maiti Nepal. To add, Aruna Roy, who is one of the women activist and motivational speaker, has been inspiring lot of individual by fighting for the governmental corruption in India. Also, Malala Yousafzai, has inspired the world by fighting for girl education in Pakistan.
In sum, it is legitimate to concur that the scandals, in national and societal levels, have surely focus every individuals attention on the significant social problems; nonetheless, the reformers around the various parts of the world have actively participated in solving major problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'focused', 'focussed'.
Suggestion: focused; focussed
...tional and societal levels, have surely focus every individuals attention on the sign...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ocietal levels, have surely focus every individuals attention on the significant social pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, so, while, for instance, in fact, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43600867679 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89601257337 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553145336226 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6037649534 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115616217287 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317292874739 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041248983467 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680770149969 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449339854981 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.