Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement maintains that universities should make their students to take different courses apart from their specific fields of study. I completely disagree with the claim: there are various aspects—social and professional—which requires the knowledge from different fields.
Initially, the primary reason why I disagree with the claim: a particular student, although, pursue his/her specific field and excel in their subject of interest, there are various social factors they need to know in order to adapt society, where they are living and contribute to them. For instance, a student who has studied social work, would like to help to solve various problems of society—poverty, sexual violence, women empowerment etcetera. Acquiring basic aspects of art and technology will really assist them to carry out creative awareness programs to solve such social problems. For instance, street dramas will be helpful to expose the sexual violence that has detrimental effects in the society. Knowledge in the various fields, in fact, helps to contribute to the society and adapt to it.
Furthermore, after completing the educational fulfillment, when students onset their professional career, there are number of related fields they will encounter; hence, basic knowledge of all these fields are imperative to the students. To exemplify the above mentioned position let us take an example of engineering profession. Apart from the advanced and basic skill-set of the respective field, some other facets, such as technology, culture of the particular group where one is working, moral standards, environmental effects, economic perspective is necessary for the engineers. To illustrate, some of the mobile software’s are efficacious in recording number of labors in the construction site rather than recording it will pen and paper. So if they do not possess knowledge from these kinds of fields, the on-going project and their efficacy in the field will turn out to be inconsequential. Hence, various professions require basic knowledge from the various fields, which are not included in school curriculum.
On the flip side, some people might argue that learning from the diverse fields will make them less productive in acquiring knowledge, and in turn they are less likely to get job in the future. But in the modern age of the competency, many of the professional fields require Tran’s disciplinary fields. For example, a person from the field of environmental sciences needs the integrated knowledge from physics, chemistry, biology, geology and social sciences. They need to study each fields independently and interrelate later for the better understanding of the environment. Had they discounted these indispensable fields from their education career, they would not be able to excel in their respective field. Hence, studying the trans-disciplinary fields would help to flourish personal development and contribute in huge respect in the given field.
In the conclusion, it is necessary to study various fields outside the subject of the study for the students; it will surely help students to adapt society where they are living and contribute to them, enhance in professional career. Universities are responsible to guide them and encourage them to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ssary for the engineers. To illustrate, some of the mobile software's are efficacious ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...owledge from these kinds of fields, the on-going project and their efficacy in the field...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, really, so, apart from, for example, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2791.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5376984127 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12376896892 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 849.6 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.998247756 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.904761905 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156272689066 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521819840545 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476382385423 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112199468544 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682357260458 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.