Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
We all are busy in our daily lives , oblivious to some of the evil and scandalous events, that happen in secrecy. Speakers in news media outlets just talk about topics that bring their news channel more clout and views ignoring certain important problems that need immediate attention. I strongly agree that scandals can help focus the attention of media and general public towards some of real problems that happen in people’s backyards.
In countries, if the people in power are left unchecked and unquestioned by the media then ministers can use this oppurtunity to personal gain and hence increasing corruption in the country.
For Instance, In India 2G scam that happened in 2001, which is 2nd highest corruption case in the world was discovered after 10 years of its occurrence. During this 10 years, billions of dollars were funnelled away into ruling parties ministers pockets and no investigation was done by media or the investigating forces. The money descrepancy was brought up by the opposition party after 10 years during the next election campaign and that did led to the tumbling of the ruling party which was in power for 15 years. After that people have become more aware of the government corruption and media have started giving importance to this issue as well. Since then no major corruption scandal has been proved in india. The above example is a strong evidence that sometimes occurrence of a scandal can help a nation evolve from its problems.
Also, In this capitalist and corporate environment where reputation is the key for being at the top. Sometimes these top tech companies assure their customers that their storage application have peak security, due to which people do upload some of their personal photos on these services but in reality glithces and bugs are exploited leading to sexual photos and videos getting leaked into the internet. For Instance, Leaking of celebrity nude photos from Apple Cloud was a major scandal that led to people not trusting Apple’s Icloud services. After facing public backlash Apple upgraded its security service for the application to use two factor authentication. The above example clearly brings into limelight the importance of scandals that can warn people on their privacy.
OfCourse, some will argue that encouraging media outlets to speak about the problems that don’t have enough evidence can help avoid the problem from occuring, but media cannot risk running news based on rumours and maybe’s, because that could effect their legitamacy and ratings as a news outlet. Sometimes action is better than words.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
We all are busy in our daily lives , oblivious to some of the evil and scand...
^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... busy in our daily lives , oblivious to some of the evil and scandalous events, that happen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n help focus the attention of media and general public towards some of real problems that happ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 651, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iving importance to this issue as well. Since then no major corruption scandal has be...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rs and maybe's, because that could effect their legitamacy and ratings as a news ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18439716312 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64877601421 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3562315701 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8823529412 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126632692472 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396402076293 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410717993798 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700739866499 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475794728015 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.