Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
In order to progress forward in any kind of work, critical judgement is required. Sometimes the critical judgement can be false and sometimes it can true. So how can one differentiate that the judgement done for a particular work is of value or not. The most safe way is to rely on the judgement for the work on a person who is an expert in that field.
Firstly, an expert in that field would have better understanding of the facts realted to that field and would be able to evaluate the work using those facts with precision and honesty.
Hypothetically speaking, If a physics student has worked on a project related to quantum mechanics then a physics professor would be able to provide the student with a much accurate and critical feedback on his work rather than a , lets say, english professor. The above example clearly shows how important it is that in order for a work to hold water, it should be critically judged by an expert.
Secondly, many doubts are removed in the eyes of public if an expert evaluates a particular work. Nowadays where different fields of work are dependent on each other. For example, In an IT company, a client who wants a website to be developed by an IT team would require the devloper judgement on whether the concept that he wants to be developed is feasible or not. Also, he would require test engineers judgement on whether the finished website is free of bugs or not. This individual critical feedback on the work is required for any work to proceed to its completion.
Lastly, there can be cases where an expert opinions can cast doubt on the result of the work. For example, the mueller report on whether Donald Trump colluded with the russians for winning his candidacy during 2016 elections left the democratic party and republicans divided on the issue.
In conclusion, most of the time ant given work only holds water when it is reviewd and critically judged by an expert in the field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and honesty. Hypothetically speaking, If a physics student has worked on a pro...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...itical feedback on his work rather than a , lets say, english professor. The above ...
^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tical feedback on his work rather than a , lets say, english professor. The above ...
^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ependent on each other. For example, In an IT company, a client who wants a website t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...nt on each other. For example, In an IT company, a client who wants a website to be dev...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
... who wants a website to be developed by an IT team would require the devloper judgeme...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'teams'?
Suggestion: teams
...ants a website to be developed by an IT team would require the devloper judgement on...
^^^^
Line 6, column 44, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...tly, there can be cases where an expert opinions can cast doubt on the result of the wor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6783625731 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60772789914 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5682040101 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295619860557 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115955847573 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786389781148 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172384782093 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666629786402 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.