108. Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Some people tend to think that critical judgment of work is valuable only if it comes from someone who is an expert in that area, others seem to disagree with it. In my opinion, I believe that it is true that the critical judgement has little value if it comes from the layperson, and the following discussion reveals my stand and reasoning.
To begin with, the critical judgement from the expert in that field can make more convicing. To be specific, the critical judgement has important value from the expert because of their specialization. For example, I did a statistic project when I was in college. When I finished my project, I think it was perfect because of the adulation from my roommate. However, I was upset after the reviewing from the scholar who was a manager of one company. He told me that the most important process of my project was wrong so that my whole result was not valuable. I believe that the judgement from him was important because he was a successful manager in that field. Thus, I think it is true that the judgement from the expert is valuable.
Moreover, the expert has more relate knowledge about the same field. That is to say if the judgement came from the expert, it is more cogent to us. For instance, if we hear the doctor to tell us that we should not eat too much junk food, we may think that this judgement is valuable because of their career. However, if the judgement came from layperson, we would think that this argument could not convince us because they did not have too much knowledge about this field.
True, some people might say that every critical judgement is important because there are different several conceptions from diverse view, and we have to accept them. However, this belief fools to consider the fact that if the critical judgement came from layperson, it would not have any precision. For example, if one person who is lack of exercising wants to teach you how to swim, and criticizes your posture, we may think that his teaching is not cogent. Thus, it is hard to convince people of this idea.
To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I think that it is true that the critical judgement has little value if it is not come from an expert in that field. There seems to be some validity to the other points of view. Nevertheless, I still believe that my reasons for my opinion are stronger.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 75.0 33.0505617978 227% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62264150943 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47655323065 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412735849057 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6526507039 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277473112397 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941284180618 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945778052433 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177542534088 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833810680758 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.