Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals in the past have been a pointer to problems that we endure in the passing of time, bringing illumination to such, and seek to discuss it. However, speakers and reformers have created a long-lasting impact of changing our society, by not only calling attention to the issues, but also ensuring a radical positive change in the society at large.
Great reformers in the past who have adversely advocated for freedom of human rights, especially with slave trade, and marginalisation, has helped put a stop to the misdemeanour from these actions. A major force to reckon with are the reformers who stood up in advocating for the abolishment of slave trades, as their voices echoed, and re-echoed the indifference between blacks and white. An example is the British abolishment of slave trades by one of Britain finest speakers.
Moreover, human right activist have also joined the train of seemingly great advocates who has helped drive home major challenges such as oppression of the poor by the ruling elites, and government policy. this has seen government negotiated to a great extent, and agree with them on certain reforms that needs to be carried out. Most of these reforms were very welcoming and has seen a radical change in the improvement of life of the common citizenry. An example is Nelson Mandela call for apartheid policy reforms after he left prison (before becoming President), this changed the way the South African's policy and reform were indurated, and observed.
Nevertheless, scandals have their usefulness and importance in bringing out grave issues that need urgent address. A critical look of the corruption in political offices, once made known to the public, can show the largesse and extent to which monies are stolen from the state treasury while no meaningful development takes place in the country. Even countries with meaningful development, will have to pour out grievance as unemployment looms the city, and a misguidedness, and misfit of the policies of government can create a poor economy. Some of these would later go in a long way to bringing to the knowledge of the public the cankers deteriorating the walls of the government institution. If addressed could go a long way in solving the problem.
In conclusion, scandals could help to bring a beacon of hope to the people, but it only provides a short-term benefit as opposed to speakers and reformers who stand through the test of time, to ensuring that the public challenges are addressed and resolved in a short possible time
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scandals
scandals in the past have been a pointer to prob...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...t large. Great reformers in the past who have adversely advocated for freedom of...
^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e ruling elites, and government policy. this has seen government negotiated to a gre...
^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a long way" with adverb for "long"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r economy. Some of these would later go in a long way to bringing to the knowledge of the pub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 697, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he walls of the government institution. If addressed could go a long way in solvin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in conclusion, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06205250597 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83176411832 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558472553699 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1780843797 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.4 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176209560307 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560145417604 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496451849676 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920473631363 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377442196087 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.