Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could
Every country has some form of scandal. Scandals are averted to be useful to focus our attention which wasn't plausible by any speaker or reformed. Scandals are an attraction centre of media. Therefore, ostensibly the negative impacts of scandal exists which has to be evaluated. Hence, profound analysis is essential prehistoric to any assertion.
Scandals being media's main source of attracting the viewers is a source of information. It is important for the citizens of the country to be aware of the scandals of the country. No scandal implies no information to the citizen. Hence no pressure on the leaders to pay heed to the wrongdoings in the country.
On the other hand scandal isn't always useful. The intrusion of media providing unassured information might lead to havoc causing the distress and fear in the people. It also provokes hundreds of views and opinions among the citizens affecting the decision making process.
While this essay propounds the importance of scandal in increasing the awareness among the citizens, persuading the leaders to solve the problem expeditiously. We can also interpret that scandals cause havoc leading to making the decision making process slower. How do we determine the effectiveness of scandal then?
In some sense, scandals are useful as scandal becomes country's priority and attracts immediate attention from the leaders. However might lead to anarchy due to misleading information provided by the scandal. Hence, it is important to have some sort of a regulatory mechanism about the information presented related to scandal. This will avert there's no unnecessary turmoil caused due to scandal and also attracts the leaders focus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... be useful to focus our attention which wasnt plausible by any speaker or reformed. S...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... implies no information to the citizen. Hence no pressure on the leaders to pay heed ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... country. On the other hand scandal isnt always useful. The intrusion of media p...
^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s immediate attention from the leaders. However might lead to anarchy due to misleading...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'sort of'.
Suggestion: sort of
...al. Hence, it is important to have some sort of a regulatory mechanism about the informat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ted related to scandal. This will avert theres no unnecessary turmoil caused due to sc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, so, then, therefore, while, as to, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35205992509 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8458308037 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558052434457 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2781286147 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.2105263158 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0526315789 23.4991977007 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 10.2758426966 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224296383654 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07292801581 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691636553926 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123183046385 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616712831847 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.