Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Adulthood outside the shores of a school is an entirely different world and a different learning process from what is acquired from school. And as such, recent graduates struggle within the first few years of graduation trying to learn the required non-academic skills to enable them to compete effectively in the labour market. Therefore, I agree with the prompt that schools should prioritise preparing students for non-academic adulthood as evidence suggests that the development of non-academic skills is more effective when teaching is integrated into the regular school curriculum and staff receive training.
Firstly, Non-academic skills exist alongside academic knowledge and can include empathy, communication, and resilience. Schools should integrate the development of non-academic skills into their curriculum for effective development of these skill sets and teachers be trained to always spot and child lagging on any of these skills and to take the best possible approach to help them imbibe it.
Secondly, the overall importance of these skills necessary for survival in the labour market cannot be overemphasized. For example, a student might be brilliant and able to solve maths questions accurately but struggles to communicate with his fellow classmates. Such a child after school will find it difficult to relate with other people which I a crucial skill for survival in the labour market. As such, non-academic skills should be integrated into the regular school curriculum so as to be taken seriously.
In conclusion, as stated above, the importance of preparing students for the non-academic aspect of adulthood cannot be overemphasized school administrators and teachers should be trained on how best to inculcate these skills in the students as it is significant in their survival after school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'classmates'.
Suggestion: classmates
...y but struggles to communicate with his fellow classmates. Such a child after school will find it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...ult to relate with other people which I a crucial skill for survival in the labou...
^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ated into the regular school curriculum so as to be taken seriously. In conclusion, as...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 279.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5376344086 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06774023948 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519713261649 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7415012563 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 5.21951772744 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242855850428 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107617905849 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696636644412 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16680844387 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290009000343 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.