If science and technology will be able to solve all of society's problem is a complicated and controversial problem. Some people believe that science and technology are limited, and thus can not solve all of society's problems, while others argue the contrary. I'd like to argue that it is true that science and technology have the potential to give us the power to deal with most of society's problems, but not all problems can be solved.
History has shown that science is capable of changing our society and tackling society's problems and thus making human life much better. One illustrative example can be found in the field of medicine. Over the past few centuries, with the technological advancement of medicine, the number of people who dies of some diseases which were thought incurable in the past has drastically decreased, and the lifespan of humans has improved, and we have been even successful in eradicating some particular diseases. Much the same example can be found in the field of computer science. The invention of computers and the internet has brought a revolutionary change in our life and society. With the help of those technologies, it is now possible to communicate with people in far distant places in an instant, which in the past took a long time. As the aforementioned examples indicate that science and technology do solve society's problems.
However not all scientific and technological advancement is always beneficial, we know some cases that science and technology turned out to be detrimental to human beings, although it was designed at first to tackle society's problem. Technology related to weapons and wars like dynamites is a familiar example. Dynamites at first was not designed to harm people in wars, rather it was invented to make mining more efficient. However, in the end, dynamites were often used in wars to kill enemies. Thus it is crucial for us to consider whether the new technology is easily abused and used in a harmful way, and discreet in accepting new technology, or technology, which at first seems favorable, would become inimical to us.
In other cases, science and technology can cause another problem, when it first seems to solve society's problem. Environmental problem is the most demonstrative example. True, recent technological advancement has made our life easier and solved several problems, but at the same time, it cost us much, by damaging the environment and causing global warming. Therefore, one lesson we can learn from this example is that we should take both upsides and downsides into consideration before accepting new technology to solve society's problems. Since it is frequent that science and technology come at a cost, exerting a bad influence on another thing
In conclusion, to recapitulate my ideas, I'd like to point out again that science and technology can solve our society's problem, but not all society's problems can be dealt with. Sometimes, they have the opposite effect and at other times they cause other society's problems. Thus it is vital for us to have a diversified point of view against science and technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
If science and technology will be able t...
^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...blems, while others argue the contrary. Id like to argue that it is true that scie...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... but not all problems can be solved. History has shown that science is capabl...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnology do solve societys problems. However not all scientific and technolog...
^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nology do solve societys problems. However not all scientific and technological ad...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ere often used in wars to kill enemies. Thus it is crucial for us to consider whethe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harmful way" with adverb for "harmful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ew technology is easily abused and used in a harmful way, and discreet in accepting new technolo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orable, would become inimical to us. In other cases, science and technology c...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a bad influence on another thing In conclusion, to recapitulate my ideas,...
^^^
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...n conclusion, to recapitulate my ideas, Id like to point out again that science an...
^^
Line 9, column 277, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...mes they cause other societys problems. Thus it is vital for us to have a diversifie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, another thing, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2608.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08382066277 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87273224312 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1340658317 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.545454545 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3181818182 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375581944875 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122086576969 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121054168404 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242022006402 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11674380243 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.