Science is meaningless without religion.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As time passes by, the rapid evolution in the technology the incessant urbanization has led many human beings to the conclusion that, religion is man made and god does not exist. The society nowadays completely relies on the truth and facts and doesn't believe in religion. The statement, Science is meaningless without religion might not be accepted in the present society, but the statement has many pros and cons and the following essay discusses the statement in depth.
Firstly, let us consider an example which can relate to both these terms, science and religion. Let's consider thunder and lightning as an example. Scientifically this takes place due to the friction between the water molecules present in the clouds and hence greater the friction, larger the lightning and the thunder. This illustration viewed religiously gives us a whole new insight. They (theist) say that lightning takes place due to a fight between the gods or if the gods are angry. Nomads or particularly vikings believed that it was Thor, the god of thunder was really unhappy at the humans. This leads us to two conclusions, one which is proved after intense scientific research and the other, which is believed from thousands of years. People don't understand which conclusion to believe in, so they usually tend to choose the one that makes them stronger or gives them a feeling of satisfaction. Thus science isn't meaningless without religion. It's depends on the human perspective.
Secondly, let us consider a huge subject, apocalypse. As every day passes by, the temperature of the earth's surface is increasing, thus an increase in global warming and hence the imminent destruction of the earth. Scientifically it is proved that the earth might be blown into pieces or the entire planet might become a huge fireball just like the sun as the temperature of the earth is increasing everyday, but according to the Hindu religion it is believed that the humans are currently in Kali Yuga, the final phase of the earth or a man, due to corruption, greed, etc, and thus we human beings destroy ourselves and the earth. The two conclusions are similar but the approach is quite different. One which can be accepted due to scientific proof and the other whose knowledge is passed over from thousands of years. Both the statements make sense, but are completely irrelevant and are not related. Hence it depends on the individual's perspective and approach.
Every human is different from one another and everyone has their own beliefs and perspectives. Few like to believe something because their loved one's believe it and few need facts or proof in order to follow their approach. Science and religion are two vast subjects and are completely different from one another. One doesn't depend on the other, but its us who bind them together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...etely relies on the truth and facts and doesnt believe in religion. The statement, Sci...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...both these terms, science and religion. Lets consider thunder and lightning as an ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...elieved from thousands of years. People dont understand which conclusion to believe ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 905, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r gives them a feeling of satisfaction. Thus science isnt meaningless without religi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 918, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...a feeling of satisfaction. Thus science isnt meaningless without religion. Its depen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... temperature of the earth is increasing everyday, but according to the Hindu religion it...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 905, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...pletely irrelevant and are not related. Hence it depends on the individuals perspecti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 929, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...re not related. Hence it depends on the individuals perspective and approach. Every huma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...pletely different from one another. One doesnt depend on the other, but its us who bin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00425531915 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72489985529 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.8721431267 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103183883742 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326657298978 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437428150206 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649350420832 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409365818384 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.