Scientists and other researchers should focus their on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people
The statement claims that researchers and experts should explore areas that are likely to benefit a large portion of the population. There are so many problems we are facing today. Environment-related problems, economy-related problems, problems in the medical field, and so on. As it is well known that research in any field requires a large amount of fund. So it is not wise to spend that much money on research that will benefit only a few people.
Firstly, in the twenty-first century, researchers and scientists have to deal with environmental problems such as pollution, the availability of drinkable water, climate change, global warming, and etcetera. Furthermore, it is the responsibility of the government to provide sufficient fund to deal with such impending problems. In addition, such research requires a large portion of the fund from the budget of the country. For instance, in Delhi, air pollution is at an alarming rate. So, government and scientists collectively have to deal with this problem. As dealing with pollution will benefit all living organism, researchers should focus more on such problems.
Secondly, there are some problems such as poverty, unemployment and other economy-related problems those need to be addressed as soon as possible. Thus experts and other researchers should focus on dealing with such problems as these problems have affected many people. And if the large portion of the country's population is unemployed or living below the poverty line than it is better to spend resources to solve these problems rather than on research that will have little or no benefit in near future.
And finally, it is not wise to spend a large amount of fund on research related to space. Building spacecraft and experiment related to quantum particle required a large amount of fund and will have relatively little immediate implication. Furthermore, sending a human into space or growing plant on mood will not provide benefit to the majority of people. So it is better to spend money on research that will benefit the greatest number of people.
In sum, though research in any field has importance, it is advisable to spend resources on research that will benefit the greatest number of people. Because the ultimate goal of research should be to provide benefit to the people. Thus, resources spent on the research is said to well spend if a large portion of its people will get benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-22 | Patel krinal | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problmes, the ability of humans to think themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 23
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 29
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., problems in medical field, and so on. As it is well known that a research in any...
^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ld, and so on. As it is well known that a research in any field requires large amount of f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ed to be addressed as soon as possible. Thus experts and other researchers should fo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... benefit the greatest number of people. Because, the ultimate goal of research should b...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortion of its people will get benefits.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23116883117 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74389492371 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438961038961 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9931176267 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9047619048 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2593347297 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858524298865 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813772981759 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148383880897 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431158905081 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.