Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
I disagree with given statement, as it is unacceptable. Scientist and researchers cannot even choose their area of field to give benefit to the greatest number of people. Benefits from outcome of a research are good for the society but it is not in the hand of Scientist.
Before choosing a research area, Scientist does not even know the result of its research. It is a universal fact that no one can see the future. Outcome of a research is based on future which is not in the hand of Scientist.
Experiments are done by the Scientists while pursuing a research and those experiments are based on hit and trial methods. Here, hit and trial method means Scientist try all possible methods according to their knowledge to make their experiment successful and by doing so they may get some successful and some unsuccessful results. They do not have any idea about those successful and unsuccessful results even before performing the experiment. So, it is obvious that they don’t know about the result before choosing their area of field.
There are many inventions already taken place in the world which presently does not give any benefit to anyone but they are done by Scientists and researchers. Scientists do not have any control on result, so they start their research on the basis of their interest and curiosity of the subject of a research. As Science is all about facts, Scientists always have curiosity to know more and more facts about their subject in which they have interest. On the basis of that curiosity, they keep performing experiments of their research again and again without taking care about benefits of the result of research to people. Some Scientists are even curious about both successful and unsuccessful results because both type of result will enhance their knowledge about the Science.
Thus, Scientist and other researcher cannot even choose their area of field to give benefits to the greatest number of people because they work on the basis of curiosity about the subject without taking care about result and also they cannot even know the result before performing the research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I disagree with given statement, as it i...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut it is not in the hand of Scientist. Before choosing a research area, Scienti...
^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...t no one can see the future. Outcome of a research is based on future which is not in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which is not in the hand of Scientist. Experiments are done by the Scientists w...
^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...e, hit and trial method means Scientist try all possible methods according to their...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t before choosing their area of field. There are many inventions already taken ...
^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...nterest and curiosity of the subject of a research. As Science is all about facts, Scienti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce their knowledge about the Science. Thus, Scientist and other researcher can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96348314607 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63272087912 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404494382022 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5261359885 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4375 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353040386428 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148062903736 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131101904216 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261739326399 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100488662411 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.