Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
Productivity of a certain company or institution often depends on the efficiency of the employees and their work ethics. It depends on the conviction with which a work is done and therefore, I totally agree with the prompt that the workers should be promoted and given raises based on their performance instead of their experience.
Years of service are a major criteria for many companies to determine the diligence and fidelity of an employee towards his or her company. But it does not necessarily invite a healthy competition for the interns who have recently joined the company and are working hard with same commitment and enthusiasm fetching fruitful results. For instance, there are many companies that have faced the hostility and animosity in the attitudes of the newly joined trainees towards their bosses due to not getting a decent pay even though they have worked day and night to achieve unprecedented results and profits for the company. Their credit is preemptively taken by a bombastic, domineering boss who has more experience than his coworkers.
This type of competitive hussle is deteriorating for the company's work culture and instigates prejudices between the employees. Collaborative cooperation gets hindered by jealousy and envy often giving rise to incompatibility in the teamwork and unfulfilling of the targets assigned.
A recent survey has shown that more than 60% of the companies in USA and China bias their pay schemes depending on the number of years an employee has served. Due to this, there has been a decline in the recruitment of young representatives in major MNCs and also created a liable loss for the company's asset which the new interns with extraordinary merit bring with them.
Performance and work should be a major criteria to judge a person's potential and his skills. No matter how experienced a person is, if he or she is not efficient enough in fulfilling his or her duties or targets and still gets a promotion due to the time period of his service, may lead to subversion in the company's milieu. Also it may create a negative reinforcements for the hardworking employees who work assiduously in bringing positive outcomes for their country.
Although it is expected by the company officials and recruiters that an employee should be stoical when it comes to the amount of money he or she is paid based on his work efficacy, it affects the employee and the company to a greater extent which cannot be ignored by turning a blind eye. Therefore, the merit of an employee should always be a vital criteria for increase in pay levels as it motivates more workers to achieve greater targets and make their company reach to the apostasy of culmination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...rience. Years of service are a major criteria for many companies to determine the dil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th extraordinary merit bring with them. Performance and work should be a major c...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
... Performance and work should be a major criteria to judge a persons potential and his sk...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d to subversion in the companys milieu. Also it may create a negative reinforcements...
^^^^
Line 8, column 356, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'reinforcement'?
Suggestion: reinforcement
...s milieu. Also it may create a negative reinforcements for the hardworking employees who work ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 352, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...of an employee should always be a vital criteria for increase in pay levels as it motiva...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00884955752 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9023310849 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506637168142 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.844956359 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.933333333 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1333333333 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227353249863 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853334787406 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734134030405 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127274738054 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869546576227 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.