Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
An organisation's productivity or the outcome mainly depends on the workforce and the amount of work done by the employees and each and everyone's contribution to the company's growth. Hence, in this aspect the age or the period of work of the employee in the organisation does not mater but the efficiency of the employee only matters.
Promoting a employee to a higher post should be done by his/her work not on the basis of his age or work experience as for an instance, a employee who has worked in an organisation for more amount of years but has less contribution to the organisation cannot be given an raise just for his work experience as the amount of contribution would stay the same from him/her, whereas , on the contrary, if an employee who has an less amount of work experience but has contributed in large amount for the organisation's growth should definitely been given a raise as it would encourage him/her for a higher productivity.
Considering the seniority of an employee it would definitely make the senior employee feel a bit uneasy to work under an person who is inferior to him/her in the case of years of service, but considering this fact would no way help in the growth of productivity of the company, and all the employees must be mentally prepared to face any kind of situation at their work place before taking the job.
On the contrary, if a employee has an upper hand over another with respect to both seniority and the productivity then he/she must be given the first preference, but , still the productivity of the employee plays the major role.
Hence, an employee must be given a raise on basis of their performance or on basis of both performance and seniority, but, not on the basis of seniority alone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisations'' or 'organisation's'?
Suggestion: organisations'; organisation's
An organisations productivity or the outcome mainly depe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the employee only matters. Promoting a employee to a higher post should be don...
^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... or work experience as for an instance, a employee who has worked in an organisat...
^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ion to the organisation cannot be given an raise just for his work experience as t...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ould stay the same from him/her, whereas , on the contrary, if an employee who has...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on the contrary, if an employee who has an less amount of work experience but has ...
^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisations'' or 'organisation's'?
Suggestion: organisations'; organisation's
...has contributed in large amount for the organisations growth should definitely been given a r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...mployee feel a bit uneasy to work under an person who is inferior to him/her in t...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der an person who is inferior to him/her in the case of years of service, but con...
^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...taking the job. On the contrary, if a employee has an upper hand over another...
^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to both seniority and the productivity then he/she must be given the first pref...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... must be given the first preference, but , still the productivity of the employee ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, still, then, whereas, as for, kind of, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73442622951 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88413996258 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 23.0359550562 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 167.150381394 60.3974514979 277% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 240.666666667 118.986275619 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.8333333333 23.4991977007 216% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.3333333333 5.21951772744 313% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347249946078 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189452867376 0.0831039109588 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101048924661 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213976182688 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931950734001 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.3 14.1392134831 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.19 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 12.1743820225 177% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 11.2143820225 196% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.7820224719 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.