Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Seniority (years of service) – works of experience is always useful in any crucial situation. It makes a decision better way. In organization seniority of employee encourage the other employee and provide the good product. But best valuable employee selects on the basis of those work efficiencies, rather than its experience.
Now days in 21st century technology builds in numerous amount. So competition also become huge to survive and make your identity in this competitive word become a difficult. So, for that increase the revenue and productivity of the organization employee must be done own work more expressively.
So, if you encourage your employees for high productivity then its beneficial for organization. But question is how should be promoted the employees? there are numerous ways, give the compensation or employee of the year award or etc. so, every employee does own job more articulate and efficacy. If you give this all things on the basis of seniority rather than work performance and merit, means you indirectly down your employee’s moral that becomes adverse. For example, if every year organization announce that Appraisal goes to which employee those has high productivity and better performance than every employee for get it appraisal work more and more efficient and provide high productivity.
If you encourage employees more then it will be beneficial for organization. So, employee compensation should not be the basis of Seniority (years of service) but should be basis of employee work performance and merit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...dentity in this competitive word become a difficult. So, for that increase the revenue and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t be done own work more expressively. So, if you encourage your employees for hi...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...s how should be promoted the employees? there are numerous ways, give the compensatio...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ivity. If you encourage employees more then it will be beneficial for organization....
^^^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...eniority years of service but should be basis of employee work performance and merit....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 58.6224719101 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 244.0 442.535393258 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3606557377 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06605589266 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512295081967 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3281078314 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453170497759 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16550161573 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152837721781 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319293022718 0.150359130593 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17920368304 0.0667264976115 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.