Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
Seniority is something which given if we feel that person is loyal to the company. Person who is most passionate about being in the merit list, hence because of his involvement and dedication his performance is mostly better than other companions of them. But this people cannot be trusted for the company as they always seek what is better for them in the first place than for the company.
For example, my friend's dad was working under his boss and was given all the responsibility at the beginning itself of representing and communicating with the clients by having trust in him. One fine day they had the argument in work and he got fired from his boss. As he was having a better connection with the clients than the boss of his, as a result, he could magnetize them to get the work. Finally, after some years, their company became a rivalry to his new company by getting the valuable client of them worked for him.
Another reason for not promoting the employees by some computers productivity algorithm is some people carry their companions with them and does not hesitate to give respective credits to their co-workers. This kind of people are more obliged for the promotion than the self-centered, unsecured people. In fact, these people are more trustworthy and more reliable for these jobs and can handle people under them quite well.
By seeing only their merits or their increment or for promotion the person who is productive than too cannot reach the top of the list that is mediocre which are the most crowd in the employees as any place cannot be taken by two individuals will get less enthusiastic for their work and productivity will get lose.
Finally, I refute the above discussion as I feel that the employees should not be judged on exclusively on their performance and should also be judged on the loyalty and involved in coordinating with other employees. Also should be loyal to the company which can be observed from his academics he performed in those years while he was working for that company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tter than other companions of them. But this people cannot be trusted for the compan...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aluable client of them worked for him. Another reason for not promoting the emp...
^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
...for not promoting the employees by some computers productivity algorithm is some people c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d in coordinating with other employees. Also should be loyal to the company which ca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, in fact, kind of, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78409090909 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60896321354 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497159090909 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1013086071 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.538461538 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 5.21951772744 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213566829459 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802516382432 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714697651723 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131565596435 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876939429536 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.