Societies should try to save every plant and animal species, regardless of the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being.
A society is a voluntary association of individuals ends or an organized group working together because of common interest, beliefs, or profession. Some would argue that is imperative for societies to save every plant and animal species irrespective of the financial welfare, human effort and time put in place, while some would maintain that such action is not worth it. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that such action is not feasible and should be allowed only in the country it is obtainable.
Different countries or societies have different needs. Take for example, in an underdeveloped country like Nigeria, societies are in dire need of social amenities, schools and industrialization which will help promote the society. All these features are still going to be carried out on the land which is being occupied by one specie of plants or another and need to be cleared before anything can be done on it. Should they neglect their needs just for the survival of some animal species or plant species? It will be harsh and neglecting if those laws are enforced.
In addition to the above discussion, the need of the individuals in the society, also needs to be put into consideration. Some individuals or family have far more pressing issues to handle than to put all their time and effort trying to save the life of a plant or an animal. They have debts to pay and they have responsibilities to take care of . The source of livelihood of a member of society might be dependent on those animals or plant you want to save. For example, if an individual is a butcher and all his source of income and means is dependent on the business, telling the person to quit his business and go broke just to save the live of an animal will be portentous. So therefore, it is better for those actions to be left for societies in which it is tenable.
Albeit, it is not feasible for all societies to save the life of plant, but it is advisable for the law to be enforced in the societies to it seems practical. Growing and saving plant helps to reduce the effect of global warming on earth, by taking out carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and using it photosynthesis, thereby reducing the effect of green house gas on earth.rowing Countries like Netherlands and Malaysia which major source of income depends on farming and forestation should be encouraged to save the plant species.
In conclusion, it is clear that proposing that societies or countries should save a particular plant species or animal species is not obtainable in all situations. Therefore, such action should be carried out in the society that it proves viable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ey have responsibilities to take care of . The source of livelihood of a member of...
^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: SO_THEREFORE[1]
Message: Use simply 'So' or 'therefore'.
Suggestion: So; Therefore
...e live of an animal will be portentous. So therefore, it is better for those actions to be l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to be left for societies in which it is tenable. Albeit, it is not feasible for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78681318681 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81266906403 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465934065934 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4721959672 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372124475766 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118605239189 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849496348772 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230421926067 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457762657158 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.