Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
In each society, there are some children which have special talents in certain fields. These talents are present from god and can be useful to society in several ways, But most of the time these talents remain hidden from others due to academic race or poverty or some other social or cultural reasons. The author says that the authorities of society should identify those children who have special talents. I agree with author’s statement about find them and give them special training to develop their talents.
It is very crucial task in any society to find the hidden talents. Today’s youth generation is running in the academic race in this world of competition. Due to these academic race after kinder garden, children engages in activities of schools, tutions etc. Generally parents and teachers force them to study as much as possible without looking about their hidden talents. Therefore, for any society it is the most important task to find these children. For tis government should organize various projects to find the secret talents. For example, in the country like India various competitions are organized about drawing, design and for some other arts. From these competitions the hidden talents can be came out and special training can be provided to them.
In field like science and technology, this talent finding work is also done by the universities. Recently, IIT BOMBAY’s team went to different local colleges and organized different competitions for engineering fields and also for 11-12th students. They find number of students in various fields and gave them training for two months in IIT BOMBAY. Also in field of computer engineering, every year the competition named “HACKATHON” selects students from various schools and colleges for special training. All the engineering colleges participate in this competitions. Mathematic Olympiads are also useful same way for students who have talents in mathematics, the government scholarships are provided to some poor but talented students.
In each field hidden talents are present. Since last decade, TV shows have become a best way to find and improve these talents. For example, In India there is a television show named “INDIAN IDOL” whose team goes each and every are of every state even in slum areas and organizes the auditions for talent in music field by general children and youth. The best children are chosen from them and then competition begins. There are several other shows which do these work. Also in each society, there are various NGOs which work for finding the talent. Recently, In Ahmedabad city, Gujarat, India there is a competition organized by one NGO who selected number of students from slum area which have various art related talents and admit them in best training schools of art.
However, I don’t want to say that work should be done for only talented students, society should do the work for practicing ordinary students. But for students which have already have special talents the society must work to encourage and improve them.
In conclusion, I would like to state that each society the project should start various projects to find the children who have special talents in different fields and also society should organize ways to train them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the engineering colleges participate in this competitions. Mathematic Olympiads are ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...Since last decade, TV shows have become a best way to find and improve these tale...
^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ts. But for students which have already have special talents the society must work t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2782.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22932330827 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6786551893 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426691729323 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5835583833 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369940328248 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11042069332 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880013290567 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235286382135 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745063501578 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.