Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue presented in which society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents is a contentious one. While some may considerer that education should be equal for all children, for example, through the same national curriculum, I consider that the education process must be the most free we can reach. Consequently, I agree partially with the recommendation. I what follows I will give my reasons.
To begin, we need to explain what we understand by society. If we considered that this society is nothing but the government which through the vote represent people's will, we could have a serious trouble. This is due to the lack of capability of a government to know what is the best for people. If, for instance, the politicians thought that only a special talent is the ability in hard science, such as maths or physics, a lot of others special talents would be forgotten. This might cause several damages in the rest of the population. In addition, this special training provided by the government would need financial aid, therefore, an unpleasant increase in taxes would be necessary.
On the other hand, if we let the market the responsibility of identify those children and then, the responsibility of training them, the situation change positively. The first responsible for their children's education are their parents. They should identify if their children have some special talent. However, in many occasions, they would not be able to do so. For this reason, I recommend that the market, which is nothing but people changing goods and services voluntarily, provides this service of identify special talents. For instance, it would be a specific department into kinder gardens and elementary schools with the aim of analyse all children with different and accurate methods. This could be done be psychologists and experts in education.
Since the knowledge is dispersed through the society, only the free interaction between human beings, in this case parents and experts in education, will reach the best results. It is impossible for the government running such kind of policy because there is no opportunity in which politicians can take all the information that we find in the market.
To conclude, I considered this recommendation as an advantageous one only if the market, in a process of free exchanges, would be the responsible to do it. These interaction should be done between parents and educational specialists in order to succeed and all government intervention should be avoided.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this interaction' or 'These interactions'?
Suggestion: This interaction; These interactions
...ges, would be the responsible to do it. These interaction should be done between parents and educ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16113744076 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95847742361 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509478672986 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7290168925 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302907193841 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944090974833 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1205130032 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172522133702 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123101794715 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.