Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Talent is like a blank check, it can be used to achieve anything or most things in life. Great minds have always impacted great things to various aspects of life, be it science, art and even medicine. Indisputedly, talent when built on, blooms and burgeons which benefits the society involved. However, talent in most cases are innate and are not learnt, any effort to introduce an external force to it would be like ouring water on stone, that is to say, developing the talent of these young children would not have any effect.
First of all, these talents are not fixed. Talent can be changeable, they are also sometimes transient. To illustrate this, let's look at an example of a child that could sing really well when he was younger. In the future, be it four years into the future, we may find out that this once talented child, that could sing melliflously, grows up with the most strident voice. This result may have not been because the talent was not being developed when he was younger, it may be that the tallent has passed its usefulness and is no longer present in the child.
Furthermore, talent is innate and not something that can be learnt. Most talents in young child were not taught to them by their parents or teachers. Trying to develop ths already inborn talent in this child, may cause more harm than good. Developing the special talent of child may be mishandled and even disrupt the God's given talent of that child. Besides, the society may want to influence or malleable thee talents and it would be a waste of resources because most of this talents are plastic and can not be worked on.
Admittedly, the talent of an individual has been known to mostly bring good fortune and even recognition to the society where it is found. Beethoven, though talented as a child, was taught how to play the piano an instructor that his father paid. Beethoven was often forced to attend this tutorial sessions by his father, ecen though he dreaded every one of them. In this case, Beethoven's talent was developed by these lessons he had with his teacher. However, this specific case does noty work well with all talented children. This forced development of talent may led to the child being very unhappy, which can, in some cases, cause more harm than good to that very child. Imagine a talented child not being able to hang out with his friends because he has talent development lessons. Most of these children subjected to trainings, grow up to be very unhappy adults.
In conclusion, i would expect that if you have read up to this point, you would agree with me that children with special talents should not been subjected to trainings in other for their talents to flouris, but rather be left alone and allow these special talents to bloom naturally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ung children would not have any effect. First of all, these talents are not fixe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...be a waste of resources because most of this talents are plastic and can not be work...
^^^^
Line 9, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... very unhappy adults. In conclusion, i would expect that if you have read up t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, well, in conclusion, first of all, in most cases, in some cases, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6987704918 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34981483743 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7829306304 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6956521739 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73913043478 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293590903024 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103449136582 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556415381453 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197449531219 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474758904996 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.