Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Special talents can be defined as the children who have exceptional skills from a young age and later in their life they might turn into Picasso of the modern age. But with great skills comes the pressure and stress on such children who are expected to give a lot more time to their skills rather than honing other spheres of life. Therefore, this issue essay is not completely in support for the statement that society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Initially, it is given in the statement that society should identify the prodigies. But what are the criteria for such students? The process of identifying prodigies may turn out to be absurd because it might happen that a child might showcase thier talent one skill today but later in their life they might not want to pursue their skill. For instance, if Albert Einstein had not discovered that he does not have any interest in the subjects like history and would like to pursue his career in mathematics then we would not be having Theory of Relativity today. Therefore, it is not necessary that if a skill is not identified at an age then the child would not be able to develop their talents later in life.
Secondly, the talents that can be observed in a child might be related to dance, singing, poetry. These are the talents which are mostly related in the arts field only.
It might be difficult to identify the prodigies in maths and science. Moreover, professions like entrepreneurship, politics require some experience or maturity in a person so that they can identify what is best in them. For instance, Greta Thunberg at an age of 16 became the environmentalist and a leader for all the people who wants to save the environment. If the society would have gotten busy to find her talent then maybe after growing she would not even give attention to environment.
Thirdly, although the statement might not stand true for all of the children but there are few whose skills were identified at young age and they were able to
create milestones. For instance, the Indian mathematician and astrologer, also known as human-computer Shakuntala Devi was able to solve trickiest of math problems from the age of five. Because of her talent she was not admitted to a school rather she practiced Vedic mathematics and showed the world her talent.
Lastly, there might be skills that could be identified at a young age but it might be difficult for the society itself to identify the special talents as then expectations of the society may rise and might not turn out great for the future of the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...casso of the modern age. But with great skills comes the pressure and stress on such c...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, this issue essay is not completely in support for the statement that society ...
^^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...completely in support for the statement that society should identify those child...
^^
Line 6, column 376, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had gotten'?
Suggestion: had gotten
...to save the environment. If the society would have gotten busy to find her talent then maybe afte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 58, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... the statement might not stand true for all of the children but there are few whose skills...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59714013825 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45670995671 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9249017957 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46079774417 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148317909547 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155601070886 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220196430329 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145790249401 0.0667264976115 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.