Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Change in virtually every society around the world is occurring at almost lightning speed. However, the importance of educating young brains for the future is likely to be immune to change. In this sense, I mostly agree with the prompt stating that it is crucial for a society to educate children according to their abilities, while I concede that it comes with a major drawback.
To begin, young members of the society carry a significance in the sense of their potential that will shape the future of the country, for their education is always utmost importance for governments and decision takers. In this vein, a more general and more inclusive insight is required to establish an education system; things should be considered in a wider perspective and after determining the necessities of a country in general then wanted talents should be looked for. It is such an immense duty that it can't be left to hands of kids, who can fade away if required opportunities are not provided. In addition, with this search and screening process it will be easier to find what is needed and what is in the hand, with this opportunity decision takers can easily guide children, families and teachers to recruit new minds for relevant vacancies. As seen, this system is significantly important for long term decisions, and not also streamlines the path for the authorities but also shows the way who wishes to be guided.
Furthermore, children are not always aware of their abilities and they lack fulfilling their potential if not guided properly, especially when they are young. History is full of 'unhappened' talents, for this not to happen, relevant authorities should create programs, find exceptional skills and exert every effort for their education to have a bright future both for that specific individuals and the country as a whole. For instance, in my hometown, people are generally not rich and they just try to find necessary food to be able to live decently, and eventually, it is difficult for them to think of the 'luxuries' of the world, which are only dreams. I this type of places, government guidance and incentives play a crucial rule. This is what happened in 2002. Local government started a campaign aiming to reach rural parts of the country and unveil the curtain on bright minds. A chess tournament was organized under the auspices of the Mayor and eventually, it grew and grew and in 2008, champion of the national chess tournament was from my hometown. As clearly seen from this incidence, children should be given the chance to prosper and fulfill their capacities.
On the other hand, this type screening process and education burden will create a sense of stress on the kids. As some scientist put it well, children should be given the chance to find the right path by themselves. No pressure should be applied to guide them. Thus, they will eventually find the truth and since they do what they wish to do, they will more likely be happier than the ones who are guided. For example, a clever kid does not have to be a brilliant engineer. Instead, he can choose to be a wonderful horse rider and have impact in another aspect of live. In this sense, if a child is clever, it makes more sense to let him use his or her brain on the things he or she loves the most.
Overall, educating young brains appropriately is crucial for a country, but it should also kept in mind that, in the end they are human beings and there will always be the ones who will fail and tend to live by themselves and solve their problems with their free decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...for. It is such an immense duty that it cant be left to hands of kids, who can fade ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'keep'
Suggestion: keep
...ucial for a country, but it should also kept in mind that, in the end they are human...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2951.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 620.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75967741935 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98996985923 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59251052497 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488709677419 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 904.5 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7336076915 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.958333333 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157119288609 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465441272976 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363635081093 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990986721882 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273508919443 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.