Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Each and every human being on this planet is unique in terms of various aspects. Different people have different talents: One might be good at studies, while other might be excellent at dancing. There is a purpose of existence of every human on this planet and they have their own effect on their milieu. Among all, there are some people who are naturally proficient with certain skills and may be more 'gifted' than others. These special set of people are exceptional in their field and are admired by millions across the world. The author states that it is a society's task to find out children with special capabilities and start training them from an early age. However, I think that author is too parochial with his/her view and I would like to state my reasons for the same in further paragraphs.
As stated earlier, we as humans are quite distinct from eachother. For an instance, even twins might be quite different in terms of their abilities, natures and thought process. The pecularity in humans is somewhat striking in nature. Some people have innate skills such as their tone, pitch and become brilliant musical artists in the future. While, some would have highly flexible bodies and are good at figure skating or dancing. Consequently, various reality television shows are coming up where the kids show their talent: Be it singing, dancing, or cooking, these shows are a platform to showcase the children's talent and later contribute to their success. One such example of the show is the boy band named 'One Direction'.
The identification of these skills at an early age lead to the success of these talented kids. If a kid has a predilection towards racquet sports such as badmintion, lawn tennis and table tennis and has shown its ability to play the sport exceptionally well, he/she can represent one's country at an international stage such as Olympics and bring glory to their country. Thus, identifying such kids and enrolling them at early age would be beneficial to the society in general. There has been an increase in sports competitions directed towards kids and identifying their athletic side. Sachin Tendulkar is consummate example of a cricketer who debuted in international cricket at the age of 17. To add to the previous point, go karting championships across Europe found out a young kid 'Max Verstappen' who is currently an F1 World Champion.
On the other hand, it would be unfair not to pay attention to other kids who might be less talented or less their talents have not been identified by people around them. Sheer ignorance of these kids and only focusing on the talented kids would have a detrimental effect on the society as a whole. It would be also the case that a child may be exceptionally well at something just that his/her skill might not have been looked at.
To conclude, while identifying talented kids at early age and grooming them according will reap benefits, society as a whole should balance the development of everyone irrespective of their talents. Specially talented kids can be supported by their families and other nearby concerned people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...xceptionally well, he/she can represent ones country at an international stage such ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consummated'.
Suggestion: consummated
...heir athletic side. Sachin Tendulkar is consummate example of a cricketer who debuted in i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, i think, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9219047619 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64424313721 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51619047619 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1312690656 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.36 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253061704251 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747173815832 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606111401018 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162391136973 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393242618682 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.