Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position
History has recorded a considerable amount of animal and plant species extinction which resulted from either human activities or other factors that are beyond human control. In a bid to properly addressing the issue of species extinction, the prompt argues that the society should only try to save endangered species if the probable extinction of these species is as a result of human activities. I mostly agree with the stance for two main reasons which I will elucidate below. However, I do concede that in some cases, it is advisable and relatively straightforward for the society to thwart the potential extinction of certain species even if it does not result from human’s activities.
To begin, Society should try to save species extinction only if their activities are prone to lead to such degradation of species because the society can only control what is within their capacity. For instance, as in the case of dinosaurs’ extinction in the late 1700s, there would be very little humans can do to prevent such species extinction. Some records show that the extinction happened due to the unfavorable climate and harsh conditions to the animal species, while other results include some other things that might have led to the extinction of the dinosaur species. Many of these factors are not easily regulated by humans, if at all they can control it. In summary, society should not even try to save species extinction that happened out of their control because it is very likely that what is causing the extinction is out of their control and cannot be easily prevented. Efforts will only be wasted by trying to curtail the norms.
In addition, Society should now attempt to save species extinction only when the probable extinction results from human actions because past attempts to save species extinction not engendered by humans have been futile. Over the years, scientists have made efforts to address the issue of species extinction occurring outside the walls of human control. Majority of the strategies employed have deemed inefficacy. For instance, a high number of research have looked into what might have led to the extinction of pinnocio, and researchers have little luck understanding how to preclude this decimation from happening in other types of species. Instead of lavishing efforts on researches that yield nothing positive, it is advisable to allocate resources to study the species extinction that might happen through human interactions, and try to prevent such extinctions as it is in the control of the humans.
Admittedly, there are some cases whereby possibly species extinction does not arise from humans, yet, factors that might be leading to such extinction are very straightforward to decipher and control by the society. In this case, it is highly advisable for the society to address the issue since they have a good understanding of how to stop such extinction from happening.
In conclusion, society should mostly try to save the extinction of species only if the extinction will result from their activities, however, in some cases when the other factors leading to species extinction are not human-caused but obvious and controllable, society should try to save such extinction from happening.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in summary, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2727.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18441064639 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80523148518 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404942965779 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.346343364 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301736379313 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120915753275 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854992103246 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21198559659 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793375482884 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.