Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of
those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your
reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you
should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain
how these consequences shape your position.
The clime of the world is changing drastically because of the actions of anthropods. These actions, with some other factors, has led to the defunct of some endangered species. Some people consider saving these species inconsequential, because their extinction is not as a direct result of human activities. But these species also contribute majorly to human existence. Thus, it is important to save these species regardless of whether their potential extinction is as a result of human activities or not.
To begin with, these rares biotas serve as lodes of weighty medications. They have been known to provide humans several important elixirs which has helped cure so many anthraxes. A typical example is the olive plant. Olive plant, which is currently reducing globally, is the provenance of olive oil which is used to cure several endodermal related maladies. Additionally, cod liver oil, which is also at the verge of extinction, provides amino-3 acid, an important cure for cancer and other diseases.
Apart from this, endangered species serve as great indices for serios climatice and ecological problems. Through the behavior of these faunas and floras, humans are able to determine the current situation of our abode, earth. An example of this is the migration of some important birds. Through these movement, humans are able to sense potential menaces in the former milieu of these birds.
On the contrary, some reasonable individuals might cavil that saving these species will incure large cost. Some might further quibble that not all these special are substantial. Hence, saving them might be an inconsequential and a boondoggle act. This might be true. However, not saving these species will depict humans a perilous being. Soft-minded animals, which include whales and monkeys, might not have trusted humans had it been we never tried to care for them. Thus, not saving these biotas will ebb our rapport with these animals due to distrust.
In conclusion, the planet is facing imminent threat as a result of human actions and some other factors. These perils, which threatens both floras and faunas residing on earth, has led to the defunct of some momentous species. Saving these species, which might come at a great cost, is now an exigent action as these species contribute greatly to human subsistence. Therefore, neglecting endangered species is detrimental not only to these biotas, but to anthropods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this movement' or 'these movements'?
Suggestion: this movement; these movements
...ration of some important birds. Through these movement, humans are able to sense potential men...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, apart from, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25964010283 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69552935371 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519280205656 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2977150895 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.84 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.56 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17802551708 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058480532595 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573608663312 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111656564483 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453279297222 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.