Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
On our mother earth, species have gotten extinct or become endangered in the process of evolution. Today human interference and man-made disasters have accelerated such phenomena. Despite the overemphasized role of human activities on endangering and threatening the survival of flora and fauna, natural hazards should also be given some weight. Indeed, protection of endangered species should be sought even if they are threatened not only by human activities since natural disasters are also extant.
The worth of the native flora and fauna is very crucial for society. They are not only a source of the basic human needs, that is, food, shelter, and clothing, but are also a part of the traditions and customs of the society. Hence, it is imperative for the community to protect them and care even more for the species that are becoming endangered. However, by merely holding the view that society can contribute towards protecting its indigenous plant and animal species only when their survival is affected by human interference, significantly undermines the importance of these species in the hearts of the natives. If for instance, a massive volcano erupted and killed a variety of plants and animals, out of which the populations of many highly diminished, it is the responsibility of the society to make amends for it and take care of the existing people that have become threatened by the cataclysmic natural event. Hence, at times of natural disasters, the society has an equivalent responsibility towards protecting its endangered species as it has at times of man-made disasters.
With the advancements in technologies, it has become very easy to predict specific natural disasters like when a meteor will hit the earth and where, which volcanoes are more susceptible to an eruption, and many more. Accordingly, steps can be taken to mitigate any adverse effects of such natural calamities on endangered plants and animals. Hence, it is not tough for the society to provide help in such cases. Therefore, the uncertainty of natural disasters should not act as an impediment towards the protection of the endangered species.
Nonetheless, it should be realized that there are specific natural calamities that cannot be predicted like earthquakes. In such cases, people usually find it challenging to protect species that are on the brink of getting extinct. Man-made disasters are like a slow poison, whose effects can be easily predicted and hence people are more eager to take steps to prevent them.
Given the uncertainties that accompany natural disasters, it does not suggest that people should become indifferent to their effects on threatened species. It is the characteristic of the responsible citizens of the society to take care of the indigenous flora and fauna no matter what affects their survival. If nature has offered us so much, reciprocating the same unconditionally is what is desired from the most intelligent creatures on earth: we, the humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'protecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: protecting
...ses, people usually find it challenging to protect species that are on the brink of gettin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2515.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26150627615 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97234397353 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468619246862 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2587976189 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191129233433 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619957557366 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041909434785 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104888212918 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615129481887 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.