Contrary views of people, choosing a field of study, on one side believes college students must consider talents and interests, on the other side believes job availability is a prominent factor. I completely adhere to the viewpoint that the credibility of people with job availability while choosing field of study as most crucial factor. The reasons for my opinion on this issue are interest of a human changes with time, a huge quantity of competing talented people are out there and future safety is ensured by job.
To begin with, We humans, have mercurial ambitious goals and interests, gain some talents and interests regardless of any guidance, act decisive and choose a field of study based on its which is devastating and dangerous to future. Furthermore, Interest and talent in a particular field of study may lead him to an enormous start in college, eventually due to rigorous efforts, hardwork and will power required may demotivate him to pursue further education. Thus resulting in reprehensible ending of an unplanned and unguided career.
Moreover, irreconcilable to the issue statement, that talent and interests are criteria a field of study must be chosen, there are ascending slew of talented and competing people out there because of huge competition it might be hard to succeed and even survive in this world. Additionally, these are not the only two criteria on which student must rely while choosing a field of study. They must examine the field closely before opting it and should research futuristic scope closely in that particular field.
Furthermore, Before choosing a field on the basis of interests and talent, one must secure job and look for higher job availability field of study because this way a person’s future will be safe. In addition to this, juxtapose to job one can enhance talent in a field of interest. This way person can pursue a better secured future as well can work on his talents.
But, there are people who have succeeded with interest and talent regardless of thinking too much about job availability. These people either had stamina or will power needed to do it.They were exceptional and phenomenon in their field they chose. Though cricket is a sport, MS Dhoni, a well known Indian cricketer chose to leave job in railways, focus and worked hardly to become one of the best cricketers in cricket history. Therefore, one needs courage, willpower and lots of hard-work to Succeed.
In conlusion, irreconcilable views of people while choosing a field of study, one side suggest interest and other side emphasizes on job availability, prefer job availability because of interest of a human changes with time, a huge quantity of competing talented people are out there and future safety is ensured by job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...le with job availability while choosing field of study as most crucial factor. The re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'slews'?
Suggestion: slews
...udy must be chosen, there are ascending slew of talented and competing people out th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...d stamina or will power needed to do it.They were exceptional and phenomenon in thei...
^^^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'worked'.
Suggestion: hardly worked
...ose to leave job in railways, focus and worked hardly to become one of the best cricketers in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08315098468 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8010000656 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483588621444 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8806199446 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.647058824 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8823529412 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399181420083 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126328954331 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094718361083 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205118104613 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794309804569 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.