some people believe that corporations have a responsibilty to promote the wellbeing of the societies and envoirments in which they operate. others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law is to make as much money as possible.
The question whether or not corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate is a contentious one. Even though the main goal of a company should be to make profit, they have no choice but to impact the societies and communities in which the operate and thus have a responsibility to promote their well-being.
First, when a company operates within a city or community, that community is directly affected by the workings of that company. If a large corporation decides to put up camp in up and coming neighborhood, the community who lives there will have to embrace a number of positive and negative consequences that that may bring. For example, if amazon decides to open a warehouse in long island city then the community that lives there prior to amazon should suspect to see higher real state prices, which could pe positive for home owners but maybe negative for renters. Moreover, they can expect to see an influx of young tech workers moving in to community which will drastically change the culture and vibes of the neighborhood. So, seeing the large impact a huge corporation such as amazon has on an existing community just by moving in shows that corporations should have a responsibility to try and protect that community.
Second, when it comes to factories, power plants and other corporations that can have an environmental affect on their surroundings, companies shouldn’t be allowed to do whatever they deem appropriate for the sake of making a profit. This can be explained by realizing that environmental commons such as water and air are used by everybody in society equally. The people who live in a city where a power plant is situated can be seen as stakeholders, since they are directly affected by the pollution that that plant diffuses and therefore, should be allowed to have some say in that corporations’ activities. One way to do so would be to force the company by law to understand its responsibility in promoting the well-being of the society in which it operates.
A contradicting argument can claim that since the law does not see the communities in which corporations operate as direct stakeholders of those corporations, companies need to put all their effort in profiting their real stakeholders – those who have risked their money investing in those corporation. That being said, even though the communities in which corporations operate did not put their money in those companies, they are still affected by those companies and thus can be seen as a partner not by choice.
In conclusion, even though by law corporations are not responsible for the well-being of the societies in which they operate, this does not mean that they shouldn’t be. The fact the corporations have a huge impact and effect, be it positive or negative, on their surroundings, they should maintain a level of responsibility over those societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether or not corporations have a responsibili...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the societies and communities in which the operate and thus have a responsibility to promo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...r of positive and negative consequences that that may bring. For example, if amazon decid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 894, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...rations should have a responsibility to try and protect that community. Second, when...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...orations that can have an environmental affect on their surroundings, companies shouldn&a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this corporation' or 'those corporations'?
Suggestion: this corporation; those corporations
...ho have risked their money investing in those corporation. That being said, even though the comm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g in those corporation. That being said, even though the communities in which cor...
^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not put their money in those companies, they are still affected by those compani...
^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of responsibility over those societies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0387755102 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1392830194 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436734693878 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8026498568 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.6 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2644463501 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112581562081 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754770337113 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181195819531 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767578641372 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.