How can the art of a country thrive? People have different opinions: some people think government funding of art should be available to all artists, but some other people object to any goverbment funding. While both of the views have its reasons and flaws, my stance is more aligned with the former that only qualified artists can gain the government funding.
I would like to share some of my understanding of art before elaborating on my reasoning. Personally, I think art is the extension of our soul; it usually come from our real life and is used to express feelings and insightful opinions. Therefore, real art is generally orignial and does not follow the trend to cater for the public or the authority.
Then, it will be understandable why some people believe that the integrity of art will be threatened by the government funding. Once the art becomes a lucrative field because of enormous amount of government funding, it will attract a lot of mercenary fake artists. In order to gain more funding, these artists may try despicable ways to make it regardless of the integrity of art. For example, when some kind of style is in fashion, they may create a huge amount of works mechanically applying that method. It will not fundamentally thrive the art but producing mediocre copies. What is worse, fake artists may get together to form factions to exclude the real artists who are usually alone and weak. Sometimes fakers can even plagiarize others' original works overtly whereby their power and influence. Furthermore, will the art contain political intentions or inclination since some artists may ingratiate the officials for the funding.
Besides, we can notice that many famous masters in the history are extremely poor like Van Gogh. Is there some relationship between poverty and art. As we have mentioned above, real art comes from life and needs insights into this world. A tough life can help the formation of shining qualities and insightful opinions which are indispensable in creating masterpieces. Supposing all the artists live a comfortable life as the result of enough government funding, are there still so many masterpieces?
However, creating art itself is not cheap; the materials it needs are usually unaffordable to the poor artists. What is worse, they may lack incomes because most of time are spent on art. As is often the case in the history, some masters like Van Gogh even does not have enough money to create and have to sell his works cheaply. In addition, some talented artists have to give up their own dreams and find another job for living; some teenagers who are gifted and interested in field even do not have the courage to begin it because they know the high cost. So, this is may be the reason why people advocate government funding.
From all discussed above, I would like to give an alternative suggestion that only the artists who satisfy the standards which of course need to be set carefully by experts can get the government funding. Then, we can really ensure the benefits of the ture artists and thrive the art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...s the extension of our soul; it usually come from our real life and is used to expre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people believe that the integrity of art will be threatened by the government fun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90804597701 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65772270306 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6509328269 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5384615385 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42307692308 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360456248462 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104193360569 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089461682577 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192268894941 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785571062602 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.