Claim: In any fileld-business, politics, education, government those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through a leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based.
Every 4 years, the American presidential election will cause a hot discussion all around the world. I believe most of us roughly know the reasons behind it. However, the statement moves forward and claim that leaders in any field, not just politics, should step down after a five-year tenure because the speaker thinks revitalization through a leadership is the surest way for any enterprise to succeed. In my perspective, I mostly disagree with both his reason and claim.
Admittedly, leadership is a critical cause which determines the future of an enterprise, but indeed there are an enormous amount of factors like monetary, policies, and chances on which the success of an enterprise depends. In other words, we can not simply predict whether an enterprise will succeed accurately only by leadership. For instance, a Chines billionaire, Wang Jianlin builds up one of the richest group company Wanda Group from nothing in two decades. And he was once the richest Asian. What is more, I have to underscore that he is a retired soldier and consistently self-disciplined all th time. His company, however, has suffered an almost fatal blow and has been heavily in debt up to 500 billion RMB recently because it is not in conformity with some polices. The above example illustrates even such a great leader who could make sure a high-speed development of an Enterprise for so long would incur such a huge defeat because of unpredictable policies. So, how could we make sure that a good leadership will absolutely guarantee the success of an enterprise?
Besides, we are not sure to find a better leader even if the leadership were the sole factor which determines the future of an enterprise. That is to say, the next leadership we choose even through some strict rules may be worse that the last one. A particularly salient example is that Tim Cook, the incumbent CEO of Apple are not comparable with his last counterpart Jobs as far as influence of Apple in this world is concerned. In addition, factors like politics and interest will also affect the election of leadership. If there were a way we can make sure the leadership is better and better, the enterprise would be go up without any fluctuation. Obviously, history tells us it is not true.
Furthermore, the claim has flaws even if the reason were right. First, leaderships in these fields are not all the same like politics and education. Before elaborating on my reasoning, I would like to discuss why we need general election every four years in some countries. This system has even been in the laws in most of the countries to prevent centralization and further corruption. However, leaders in schools are usually different. As is often the case, many presidents of universities has a rather long tenure. In addition, these leaders can deal with official businesses better and better as the experience accumulates. And we do not worry too much about the centralization and corruption because of the relative clean environment in education. So, it is unreasonable to require that leaderships in these fields have the same length of tenure. Besides, the '' five years " in the claim is groundless. If it is true, why is the tenure of the president in most countries four years?
To sum up, I mostly object to both the reason and the claim and I would like to argue that this issue involves a plethora of factors and it is unrealistic to give a simple but right suggestion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...prise, but indeed there are an enormous amount of factors like monetary, policies, and...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n other words, we can not simply predict whether an enterprise will succeed accur...
^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
...s to say, the next leadership we choose even through some strict rules may be worse ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 865, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same length of tenure. Besides, the five years ' in the claim is ground...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, all the same, in other words, it is true, to sum up, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2873.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 585.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91111111111 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89181766272 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499145299145 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 909.9 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.191783091 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7666666667 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198457999922 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441671458074 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664102048592 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118089944302 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100858698084 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.