Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
What role should the government funding play in the development of arts? Some argue that it is necessary for the flourish of art can can guarantee the availablility of art to everyone equally, while others believe that government funding will turn art creation into chasing of fame and fortune and thus harming the purity of art. My opinion is more align with the former one that government should undoubtedly fund the art the unsure its prosperity.
First, arts is central of our cultural life and will benefit the whole nation. Nothing can convey the image of a nation more vividly than a master piece of art. For example, the various sculptures from the ancient Greek show the spirits of the people even hundreds of years ago. In an age when nationwide communication becomes inevitable, arts surely can be a good way for a nation to build its image and spread to the whole world.
Moreover, arts play an essential role in the nuturing of imagination and creaticity, especially of the next generation. Imagine a child who sees a painting in a museum depicting the mysterious night sky. The child is deeply attracted and grows interest in the outside world. He may turn to a poet, an astronaut, or a physics scientst in the future to further fullfill his curiosity and all of these originiate in the painting he sees in the museum.In fact, governments all over the would are beginning to realize the value of art eudcation and are investing time and human resources to build galleries, museums and art schools.
However, on the other side, people worry about the detrimental effects government funding may have on arts because they may hinder the free expression of art by appraising the works more aligned with the values the government advocates. I would like to argue that these drawbacks can be effectively avoided with careful design of regulations and the supervision of social media. We have to admit that even the artists who pursue the altimate value of pure art would have to more or less rely on his or her works to make a living. If the government do not step out to take the responsibility of cultivating arts, then the market force will take place. Looking aourd our movie theatres and bookstores, we can all see the consequence of market selection. Our cultural and entertainment life is filled with works of bad taste that will fade in several months.
In conclusion, I support the claim that government should fund arts to encourage its production and propogation. These measures will benefit the society with benefits outweighing the disadcantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: can
...it is necessary for the flourish of art can can guarantee the availablility of art to e...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 449, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e in the painting he sees in the museum.In fact, governments all over the would a...
^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....In fact, governments all over the would are beginning to realize the value of ar...
^^
Line 13, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'effects'' or 'effect's'?
Suggestion: effects'; effect's
...ide, people worry about the detrimental effects government funding may have on arts bec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9290617849 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76389854148 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535469107551 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2297986135 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.368421053 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421127890462 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115185875002 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117865517628 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227220011652 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136848166127 0.0667264976115 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.