Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people.
Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Art forms a particularly important aspect of many religious cultures around the world. Art that we get to perceive at famous archaeological or excavation sites showcase the brilliance of artists from the bygone years. It also helps people connect to their religious roots based on the art and engravings found at these historical places. Art has helped many archaeologists unearth valuable insights into the historical background of human civilization. Hence, I am a strong advocate of the statement that a monetary support should be bestowed towards art to ensure that it can flourish and be accessible to all the people.
Pastoral backdrop of a country that is characterized by villages and small dwellings are the sources of ethnic art that describes the religion and the culture of that country. We can take the example of India. India is a culturally diverse nation. It has a plethora of cultural and religious sects and each of them have a defined way of going about art. Art can be in form of paintings or weavings on the cloth that form beautiful designs. These individuals have an eye for art, and they use it to earn a living. If the government provides funding for these people or provide adequate tools to these workmen at a reduced price, then it will help the reap higher rewards for the work they do. This in turn will help bolster the economy of the country since the clothing is made in the country and bought by the citizens of that country.
Moreover, art is a form that should not be restricted to the people who happen to be direct descendants of a famous artist or a painter. Art is a medium through which we can promulgate a message amongst the masses. Therefore, the government should promote art amongst people and educate them over beauty of art. If more people start taking up art out of interest, higher would be the chances of discovering a prodigy amongst the masses.
On the contrary, people can argue that making art accessible to all the people will eventually drive art to be labelled as a mundane task. The integrity would be lost since it would be seen that everyone is taking up art and coming up with something. Art will no longer be an exclusive form. But I would contradict by saying that if more and more people invest their time in art. greater are the chances of discovering a new form of art that was previously oblivious to mankind.
I would therefore like to conclude by reiterating the fact that funding provided by the government would go about a long way in ensuring that the culture of art survives in a world which now a days is characterized by digital forms of media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n at a reduced price, then it will help the reap higher rewards for the work they do. Th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Greater
...d more people invest their time in art. greater are the chances of discovering a new fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...ulture of art survives in a world which now a days is characterized by digital forms of me...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...re of art survives in a world which now a days is characterized by digital forms of me...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70346320346 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70040795198 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491341991342 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1582143625 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4782608696 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430628550907 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131603165717 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765897472808 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257926915451 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691432197669 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.