Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d

Essay topics:

Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

It is necessary to provide government funds to arts, as art is an intrinsic part of culture. Lack of financial help may result in extinction of certain arts. Also lot of people like to witness some sort of art in their free time, so it is duty of government to support various art forms.

Art is an inseparable part of any society, they often show the richness of culture. Various art forms are being performed from centuries. People like to enjoy different arts. It is necessary to make art available to all people. Also it is very important to disseminate greatness of the arts. Moreover, if given necessary attention and funding, some kind of arts like pottery or crafts can help the nation to become economically strong. Amateur artists should be given proper support, so that they become renowned artists one day.

Lot of people are earning their meals by art. For example, consider an art gallery, one art gallery can employ at least 10 people in various posts, from manager to janitor and gallery can generate some revenue for nation as well. Funding of arts helps to reduce the percentage of unemployment. Sometimes lack of support to arts and artists may lead to extinction of art forms altogether which means a part of society is lost forever.

In contrast, there might be scattered incidents of scam in the field of arts, providing financial help to arts does not break the integrity of art always, instead, it bolsters the art and artist, and helps the art flourish. Some archaic art forms are about to get extinct because of paucity of funding. Also performers of some art forms live in repulsive living conditions. Funding helps to eradicate the destitution of performers and they can lead a normal life and devout their energy towards arts, which in turn strengthens art.

Art is an inherent piece of society’s culture. Lot of people are earning their livelihood from performing various art forms. Some ancient arts are at the verge of extinction. Once they are lost, its hardly possible to revitalize them. So It can be strongly agreed that government funding is essential for the survival of variety of art forms. However, funding may not always impugn the arts, along with funding, requisite precautionary measures should be taken to preclude any misappropriations happening with funded money.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y result in extinction of certain arts. Also lot of people like to witness some sort...
^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ry to make art available to all people. Also it is very important to disseminate gre...
^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
...ld of arts, providing financial help to arts does not break the integrity of art alw...
^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... extinct because of paucity of funding. Also performers of some art forms live in re...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, at least, for example, in contrast, kind of, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95396419437 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6849421079 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496163682864 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.147490798 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7083333333 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2916666667 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476505929063 0.243740707755 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154799385834 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090866137764 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315011896124 0.150359130593 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335929303616 0.0667264976115 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.