In this issue, author states a dual response in which he/she has highlighted the two viewpoint on the funding of art by govt. According to author, some people believe that it is advantageous for the people to provide funding on the art as it ensures easy availability and widespread while other people believe it is harmful as it will shatter the integrity of the art. By funding the arts, Govt. tries to ensure that it will be within the reach of every person. Every person have the opportunity to know different arts. For example, a poor person having skills in good management of work and influencing others in order to obtain social as well as his personal goals can get opportunity to show his skills by establishing his own business or by creating any cooperative society with help of various funding and loan schemes of govt. in bereft of which he/she may not be able to do so.
However, on the other side, there may be some difficulties also. It may also threaten the integrity of any art as some rapacious and cunning people may use these schemes for their personal benefit. For example, a opulent person with selfish means uses the govt. funding schemes on infrastructure development for making benefit for his own and depriving the society from the those advantages. Person may falsely show his interest in the subject in which he/she actually does not have any knowledge and not any interest.
So, it can be concluded that there are many people that can benefit from such funding but the possibility of these funding being misused by some rapacious people cannot be neglected. Hence if govt. decide to provide any such funding for any art it must ensure that it must benefit the needy by keeping check on people try to who misuse these funding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...the reach of every person. Every person have the opportunity to know different arts....
^^^^
Line 1, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he/she may not be able to do so. However, on the other side, there may be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...er side, there may be some difficulties also. It may also threaten the integrity of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...or their personal benefit. For example, a opulent person with selfish means uses ...
^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y knowledge and not any interest. So, it can be concluded that there are m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e rapacious people cannot be neglected. Hence if govt. decide to provide any such fun...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people try to who misuse these funding.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8013029316 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53338958534 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495114006515 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5294494721 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309626373377 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10710158803 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103414599877 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220292875006 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832021747919 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.