Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.

Art is a vital component in any culture. It is important to protect the art, Governments should play a main role in funding and protecting arts. While governmental funding is crucial for the survival of the arts, some people who believe government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. In a lot of cases it does threatens the integrity of the arts, but it can be limited by laws and policy to protect the integrity of the arts.

Artists should have the free well to express their ideas, any efforts to limit this freedom will empid the creativity and imagination of the artists. Which will have a deleterious effects of art quality and quantity. For instant, government fundings for arts in the middle east control the artists freedom of express. The funding available for artists who promote the government policies and positions. While artist who criticize the government put in prisons.This control on arts led to destroying art integrity, evenmore, creativity.

In other hands, in western countries artist express their ideas freely without restrictions. While government funding aims to secure the fertility of the arts, governments believe that different types of the arts is vital to reflect the cultural, political, and economical aspects of the society. So, governments put in place different laws and policies to protect the arts from corruption. Government funding of the arts in these countries help secure the arts from corruption, when artists do not get the funding from the government, they will work for private sector. Private sector funding for arts poses a real threat to its integrity.

In conclusion, while the arts thrive on government funding, it is critical to protect the arts integrity. Artists should express their opinions freely, since artistic works are the mirror of the community culture.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... artists. Which will have a deleterious effects of art quality and quantity. For instan...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...for arts in the middle east control the artists freedom of express. The funding availab...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the government policies and positions. While artist who criticize the government put...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...criticize the government put in prisons.This control on arts led to destroying art i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...tivity. In other hands, in western countries artist express their ideas freely witho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
... funding, it is critical to protect the arts integrity. Artists should express their...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20066889632 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78044117407 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2239194652 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471423325939 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175581752342 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118310932464 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30461125718 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124606975497 0.0667264976115 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.