Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
It is widely debated that how government officials should deal with their decisions. Some people claims that they must carry out people's will while others insist that they should make decisions based on their own judgement. Though both sides have their champions, I believe that carrying out people's will better aligns with my position.
Admittedly, officials that base their decisions on their own judgement can speed up the procedure and adjust more immediate solutions to the problem which seems to be the better when there are emergencies. For example, in 1998, a devastating earthquake in Taiwan caused numerous houses to collapse. Fortunately, Taiwan's president made an expeditious decision to send support right away and save thousands of lives. It the president take time listening to people's demands and thought, then a lot of people might died because of the slow rescue.
However, the number of emergencies is at a minor position , the majority of decisions need longer and deeper consideration and also need to gather people's preference. If the government overlooks the suggestions from people they serve, then the satisfaction of the people to the government will gradually decrease, and will not be supportive at last. In north Korea, their previous was devoted in nuclear weapons but was reluctant to listen to people's groan for insufficient food. Though the leader is successful in some fields, his people suffers from hunger and was not satisfied by his leadership.
Moreover, while officials make decisions only from their own judgement, the decision they make will not be as comprehensive as that made together with different fields of experts. Consider the construction of roads in the mountains, where there is the dwelling place of endangered animals. If the government did not listen to people living there or the experts in this field, then the endangered species might disappear due to the destruction of their habitat.
In conclusion, though making decisions based on the government's own judgement can be beneficial in urgent cases, deeper consideration including other people's thoughts will be advantageous while dealing with longer-term problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2022-11-23 | zanzendegi | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | rockchisom | 79 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Sumit68 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 76
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 60
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 80
- Solutions to prevent injuries of glass to birds 76
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...It the president take time listening to peoples demands and thought, then a lot of peop...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er of emergencies is at a minor position , the majority of decisions need longer a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39766081871 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86110571846 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9397389125 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419613663338 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132986883663 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108327315186 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236955692665 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13561332393 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.