Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author contends two varied perspectives toward the right of governor for informing the citizens. While there are some people who believe that the leader can have some secrets in the political realm without sharing with the public, there are some others who feel the national possesses this right to be aware of whole details. In what follows, I will illustrate the possible clues for these views and finally, I will mention my position.
The group which feels that the head of nation could hide some information from people may have two striking reasons for this disposition. First of all, this group may assume that there some new and event in the governing area which could cause panic among the people. In a situation which is emergency and requires full concentration and efforts dealing with the dread of denizens will be an extra effort for the leader which even could have a side-effect on the ultimate result. In this case, hiding the situation and focusing on the proper solution is a wise option. Another plausible reason could be the discouraging reaction of people in the initial steps of political affairs. Most of the activities in this field in their first step possess a schematic appearance which could be understandable by ordinary citizens in society. According to this misunderstanding, there is the possibility of overreaction by the people for the novel idea and its result. In addition, even there is a chance of shutting down the plan before it ignites. However, if the idea gets on the progression, it would get more materialistic appearance which is more tangible for the public.
As mentioned, there is another group how believes the public should be conversant of entire events in the governing territory. This group may also have two adherences for this stand. Firstly, the awareness of people is equal to transparency. Citizens can follow every step and action of the ruler and inquire about his performance; indeed, they are the supervisors of his actions. In this circumstance, the possibility and chance of malicious action by the ruler will be decreased. It is obvious that the sense of ultimate and limitless power could ruin the behavior of people. If the governor feels the freedom of participating in any action without being accountable for its results, he could do dangerous actions such as a corruption attitude in the power such as the dictatorial or embezzlement. Secondly, while people are aware of all details, they gain faith over their leader, and support his action and afford. This adherence and support are really crucial for the thrive and flourishment of society.
My attitude is mostly aligned to second groups view which asks for full information from the political heads. First of all, from my perspective, the discussed reasons by this group are logical and plausible. Furthermore, I have one more reason to support this view. The current society is a modern nation in which the governor is by the people, from the people, and for the people. Consequently, there is concreted and cogent chain among them, and exchanging the data and information causes deeper interconnection. For instance, if the governor does not know the crux demand of his people, how he could defray the best facilities? It is possible in the case that they have the conversation and exchange of the data for listing the requirement list and proficiency of the presented services.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned arguments depicts that the leaders should share all events with the public without any distortion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
... for the leader which even could have a side-effect on the ultimate result. In this case, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is more tangible for the public. As mentioned, there is another group how...
^^^^
Line 3, column 971, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ence and support are really crucial for the thrive and flourishment of society. My attitu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with the public without any distortion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2967.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 589.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03735144312 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92639038232 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83375108144 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46519524618 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 921.6 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1981340916 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.310344828 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3103448276 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55172413793 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274169561089 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068218672491 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596898420132 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153071930601 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680611441747 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.