Some people believe that the most important qualities of an effective teacher are understanding and empathy. Others believe that it is more important for teachers to be rigorous and demanding in their expectations for students.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
When it comes to education of a student, the two most important elements are the modules that the students study and the teachers who are responsible to teach those modules. A teacher is characterized as an effective one or not by their ability to make the students understand what they’re teaching. But i think more factors should be taken into consideration when judging the effectiveness of a teacher. If contemplated, there could be equal justification to both the qualities mentioned in the given stances but in my opinion, a teacher must be empathetic and understanding in a few circumstances and rigorous and demanding whenever required for the following reasons.
First of all, a school has grades ranging from kindergarten to high school. It is evident that a high school teacher will not teach first grade students the way they teach high school students. The conduct varies with different age groups. A lower grade teacher is expected to be empathetic and understanding so that the students are felt more and ease and communicative. Those are the years when they explore their interests and their ardor towards a knowledge domain they are passionate about. A rigorous and demanding teacher who expects too much from students might be disadvantageous for lower grade students as they will be unable to articulate their feelings as freely as they can with teachers who are rather understanding. Similarly, a Kindergarten teacher cannot behave the same way with high school students. One the other hand, discipline should be taught to students from the early ages which can only be achieve if the teacher is rigorous and demanding. Surveys have shown that the children learn more from the fear of their teachers and this has been successfully practiced in various countries. Therefore, teachers should act depending on the type of students they are taking care of.
Second of all, every student is different. Some students are able to handle the pressure that comes with a rigorous and demanding teacher, but some students find it difficult to cope up which could lead to serious mental illness. In these cases, either of the characteristics fail to depict their effectiveness. The composition of a classroom cannot be changed due to this issue and hence a teacher is expected to act differently with different students. This does not only affects the students but also put a burden on teachers.
That said, i believe either of the characteristics have their own pros and cons and differ depending on the situation. It does not matter how the teacher should be if they are able to convey their knowledge accurately to the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s understand what they’re teaching. But i think more factors should be taken into...
^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...as freely as they can with teachers who are rather understanding. Similarly, a Kindergarten teacher cann...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
... different students. This does not only affects the students but also put a burden on t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ut a burden on teachers. That said, i believe either of the characteristics h...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, similarly, so, therefore, i think, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0709382151 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94120053353 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485125858124 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5757083006 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.523809524 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8095238095 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386817587565 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104690661185 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713440870587 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227784566036 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858381738737 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.