Being laudable and successful leader is certainly the hot-button issue in this zeitgeist. Hence, such topic raises the controversial issue whether is the effective political leader ought to yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. In contrast, some people believe that the venerate leader who is able to remain consistently committed to particular principle and objective. Thus, I generally agree with the second school of thought. Indisputably, to govern a country there are fixed roles and regulations that regulates and facilitates their life in order to burgeon society, economic and education. So, to substantiate my case this essay will elaborate my reasons and examples.
To begin with, the first the foremost point coming to the mind is a never end cycle of benefits that comes with a restricted political leader such as, firstly, frame out the basic roles and regulations will keep the people mind safe. In other words, I would like to point out that being restricted with the fundamental principles, people life will become lucid and away from any debate. To illustrate one vivid example is by being committed to the medical principles and being aware enough about the importance of keeping people life secure, this situation is based on firm political leader with restricted roles because what known that in the medical field there are a lot of theoretical opinions and if the leader will follow all of them the end result will be terrible.
The second vital point that should be taken into consideration is by being committed to principle and objective is not necessarily indicate restricted mind, further illustration the successful leader who is listen to different points of views and examine all the views seriously to get the maximum benefit from each opinion. Admittedly, that listening to various and varied background will flourish the country and will lead to further advancement. Hence, all the evidences above demonstrates that by being farm and objective will assure the success.
Furthermore, the opponents claim that the effective leader who is flexible and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. However, the truth here is when the leader is responsible about millions of people it is impossible to take all the people opinions into account that will raise disputes or creates state of dissatisfaction among people. In deed, that everyone has his or her opinion and wants the opinion to appear to people. So, how the opponents will solve the debate?.
In conclusion, and due to aforementioned reasons and examples the outstanding leader how is able to maintain roles and regulations and at the same time able to listen and get what will benefit the people. Further, being loose leader will worsen the country status as long as there is not specific staunch control over them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
.... In contrast, some people believe that the venerate leader who is able to remain consistent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('never') instead an adjective, or a noun ('end') instead of another adjective.
...he foremost point coming to the mind is a never end cycle of benefits that comes with a res...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them the end result will be terrible. The second vital point that should be ta...
^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'listened'.
Suggestion: listened
...lustration the successful leader who is listen to different points of views and examin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2396.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17494600432 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77249810667 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501079913607 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.3026699067 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7222222222 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289917511111 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924985961632 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981564396824 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162599056757 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915577221923 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.