Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
The text presents that
In order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise, however, other believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Nonetheless, I storngly agree with the first contention because of the following reasons.
First of all, In my point of view, politics is just for the welfare of the citizens. If their task doesn't meet the common people's social upliftment then it has no meaning. For the supporting example, consider, in a village there is a shortage of even basic human fundamental necessasities. If a leader rise his principle, it will be out of scope, people's won't give much interest in such principle. However, if a political leader rise the voice of public, demanding and helping to provide the public necessaties. In such case, the real etho of pollitics is flufilled.
Second of all, in Nepal, initially communists were rising, but when they reached to the power, they were unable to fulfill the public demand, consequently their growth tended to downfall. Principle is one thing, while public opinion is one thing, without people there is no principle, so in my view, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise.
Third of all, however others believe that the most essential quality of effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objective, of course it sound excellent but it lacks the cardinal meaning of the politcs. Politics is for the welfare of the society, a nation is called prosperous when it's all citizen has good per capita income, quality food, quality education. So political leaders must focus to improve these things, no matter what is their principle.
In sum, I strongly agree that, in order to be effective, poliitcal ileiaders musit yeld to publici opinion and abandon prinicple for the sake of compromise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s just for the welfare of the citizens. If their task doesnt meet the common peopl...
^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... welfare of the citizens. If their task doesnt meet the common peoples social upliftme...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 191, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sounds'?
Suggestion: sounds
... principles and objective, of course it sound excellent but it lacks the cardinal mea...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 336, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ety, a nation is called prosperous when its all citizen has good per capita income,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, third, while, of course, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18126888218 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81486703408 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513595166163 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4082828329 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515487238556 0.243740707755 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143820844062 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181512715189 0.0758088955206 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237181952099 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190592290585 0.0667264976115 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.