Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely with your position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address a both of the views presented
Political leaders are those who have well-defined principles and objectives and make decisions which may have a influence around the country or the world. So, some people argue that policitens should listen to people and yield to public ideas , abandon their principle to get compromise, while others believe that a quilfied political leaders should obey the principles and the fact to make a decision that benefit people. In my perspective, I tend to give my vote to second standpoint that political leaders should follow their own principles and objectives to make decision, while I think listen to the demands from citizen is also essential. The main reasons I choose this position are listed as follows:
First of all, political leaders should listen to the people since the advice from people is the mirror of social progress. The cornerstone of government’s responsibilities is to benefit their citizen and facilitate their life. Listening voice from the citizen enable government to make the most beneficial and the most sensible strategy. The famous motto “of the people, by the people, and for the people” is deemed as important moral principle be every generation of government. Political leaders should listen and filtert the demand from people.
However, government officials should also have their only principles and objectives. Political leaders are types of people who choose from hundreds and thousands of people, who must have their own principles and objectvies to make them standout. For example, Roosevelt, the presidential of United States from 1933 to 1045, insisted his principle and enacted the new deal which was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations, fostering wage growth and sustaining the purchasing power of millions of Americans.
Moreover, political leaders who have their principles and objectives are considered to be credible and be trusted to eradicate the miseries of the people. A leader is shaped up by his principles and objectives. At any point of time, if he or she changes his or her belief easily, then it will mar his or her position in the society and create chaos because people will not be bale to discern his real character.
On the other hand, people may rose request from many different fields, which may most relavent to their own benefit. And people tend to convince what they believe and become hard to discern the fact.
In conclusion, it is crucial for political leaders to hold their well-defined principles and obejctives, because their are chosen to make the decision and benefit people, which also can enhance the reputation of government officials, help people to make the most sensible choice, while listening the demands from the citizens is also critical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tives and make decisions which may have a influence around the country or the wor...
^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sten to people and yield to public ideas , abandon their principle to get compromi...
^^
Line 3, column 1005, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ther hand, people may rose request from many different fields, which may most relavent to thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ined principles and obejctives, because their are chosen to make the decision and ben...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2202247191 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78208117569 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478651685393 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1572416629 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.647058824 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235805889796 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892081889013 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569833761147 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158787071001 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397608137615 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.