Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
I completely agree the second point of view that in order to be a successful political leader, the ability to remain consistent is very crucial.
Firstly, I believe that every leader should have his or her opinions and should be able to represent it to the world. A leader should have his own believes, principles and morals. By following this believes and principles not only makes him a great and trustworthy political leader but also makes him a kind human being. And this quality of commitment people tend to look in a leader. For example, in a relationship too commitment is the key factor, if the other person is not even confident about his own's believes then this person is going to think of him as a diffident or not confident person. Hence, I would like to again say that for a political leader to be successful staying committed to your particular principles and objectives is very important.
While, if some other person has a unique solution to a problem or to a situation then dogmatically forcing your opinion or believe is not an ideal resort. A great leader should also be able to listen other persons opinions, if that particular resort is beneficial to the whole team or organisation then keeping aside own's believes and happily listening other's choice would be a great option. For example, considering people's opinion about a certain upcoming project would be highly appreciated by people but not even considering people's opinion about something because of ego or objectives or aims would not at all be entertained by people.
A great leader is made by a lot of compromises, prescience and commitment to people and his own moral values and objectives. Thus, I would like to conclude that staying consistent in work and remaining loyal to moral values, principles and objectives is what makes a great leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hip too commitment is the key factor, if the other person is not even confident a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, so, then, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81816445069 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6168899024 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342818119761 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134174037581 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397183458841 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209414257425 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443616492766 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.