Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
In todays changing and modernizing world, technology plays a vital role in our life. Elder people believe that the excessive use tech reduces human's interaction ability. On the flip side the updated versions of science facilitate us with better and fast ways of communication. The technology has given us both bane and boon. Overuse of devices are curse for mankind; on the contrary side it helps us to thrive in various era. I would say that the use of technology should be done for limited time and for a valid purpose.
To start with, we are surrounded by different technological equipment’s in our life. The main and predominant tool is mobile phone. In our routine life we use this equipment for majority of the time, and many of people become addicted to these devices. The core purpose of the mobile phone is to connect easily with people on call. There are many useful features in it; like we can connect with the people on social media and easily get to know about them and also, we can keep updated ourselves with it. Many teenagers are nowadays become addicted to these social media platforms, and they avoid personal communication. In the early days people used to unite and share their thoughts and experiences with others. now every person of a family is connected with each other on virtual media. But, are they connected with each other personally and emotionally? it is an alarming question of decade.
Next, the increasing use of technology causing isolation from the real world, people have more inclination towards the virtual world in compare to the real world. It will ultimately increase procrastination in people. the inclination towards the technological devices reduce their creativity, productivity and imagination, also the intellectual abilities of human. The humans always find easy ways to complete their work. The people are becoming addicted to the technological innovations. The overuse of mobile phone had weakened their relationships with people. Rather than connecting with the world on the virtual world they should connect to their loved ones.
On the other hand, the mobile phone is a multitasking device which is very useful in our routine life. It makes things easy for us like maps, banking, camera, sound recording etc. ultimately, the science is helping us to flourish in various fields. the finding of the internet and mobile phone have made our life easy and so we can connect to any person in the world at speed of light. it is also helpful in the remote locations. For example, the soldier on the border can easily connect to his family or the people of the same family living at different locations to earn their bread and butter; they can feel connected to their family members. At the same time, the technology provides them emotional support by connecting them with each other.
To conclude, I would say that the technology is the double-edged sword, there are both pros and cons of it. The limited use of it helps us thrive and help us to keep up our interacting with humans. Personal and physical connection is as much as necessary as the virtual one. People need to maintain the balance between two of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r limited time and for a valid purpose. To start with, we are surrounded by diff...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Now
...r thoughts and experiences with others. now every person of a family is connected w...
^^^
Line 5, column 864, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... each other personally and emotionally? it is an alarming question of decade. ...
^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ely increase procrastination in people. the inclination towards the technological d...
^^^
Line 9, column 490, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...icted to the technological innovations. The overuse of mobile phone had weakened th...
^^^
Line 13, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ultimately
..., banking, camera, sound recording etc. ultimately, the science is helping us to flourish ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...lping us to flourish in various fields. the finding of the internet and mobile phon...
^^^
Line 13, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... person in the world at speed of light. it is also helpful in the remote locations...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, on the contrary, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2661.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95530726257 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70902681705 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469273743017 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 859.5 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4572854316 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2647058824 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7941176471 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38235294118 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377146708645 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904003283532 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543934335085 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220738662467 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473612498151 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.