Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Whether it is worthwhile saving endangered species intrigues numerous people. While some contend that it is necessary to save every plant and animal species at the cost of money and time, others hold the opposite view. From my perspective, there is no need to devote so much money and time to those endangered plants and animals.
I have to admit that some endangered plants and animals are of great importance to human beings. For instance, pandas, as a symbol of China, are a kind of endangered animal. In Sichuan Province, government spend money building the gigantic parks for pandas to live in. The reason why we keep protecting pandas is that they are the representative of Chinese animals and contribute a lot to the communications between China and foreign countries. Accordingly, given the use and advantages of saving those pandas, no one can safely claims that this investment is unnecessary and futile.
However, does every plant or animal need special protection? In my opinion, the answer is not. First, in the forests, it is the regular rule that the stronger will beat the weaker. Endangered species may derive from their low ability of accustoming themselves to the climate change. When the temperature rises or falls down quickly, if a plant is hard to survive then it is useless for us to make efforts to save them. Wild plants and animals obtain the ability to adapt to the new environment. If we randomly interrupt this balance, the result can be extremely serious, even leading to more extinction. We are supposed to obey the environmental rules instead of change the fundamental rules for animals and plants. If a plant is about to extinct, we’d better firstly consider what triggers this result instead of arbitrarily building greenhouses for them.
On the other hand, even if we endeavor to save those endangered species, no one can guarantee the positive effects in future. What measurements we take now doesn’t necessarily suffice to generate future flourish of those species. A better environment like the greenhouse enables the plant to grow better, but it also deprives the plant of its interactions with other species. Without bees spreading the seeds, without natural rains, the development of this plant is uncertain. What’s worse, growing in the greenhouse may accelerate the speed of extinction due to more water and higher temperature. For the government, the decisions should be made for all the society other than animals and plants. If those efforts cause more people to lose jobs, then the government should reconsider the value of this measurement. After all, plants and animals are just part of environment and ignoring people’s life can inevitably result in unsatisfactory feelings of people.
To sum up, saving endangered species at the expense of large quantities of money and time is not worthwhile. While for some certain animals and plants, those investments are in great need, we are not supposed to devote limited resources to every plant and animal species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether it is worthwhile saving endangered spec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'claim'
Suggestion: claim
... saving those pandas, no one can safely claims that this investment is unnecessary and...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... one can guarantee the positive effects in future. What measurements we take now doesn&ap...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, while, after all, as to, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14747474747 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85150638513 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6514366668 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3703703704 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230743413481 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609373390356 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623323769666 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144392148497 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544914369528 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.