Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
we live in a place where existence of human being is possible due to environment around us. environment consist of all the type of plants, all small and big animal, insect and other living things. human, plants and animals sharing this living place equally from long time. Now, as the life style of human being is improving and still progressing, we start entering in area of animal and plants which may imbalance our system. With improving life style of human being, we need to take care of animals and plants around us.
we are very much dependable on the plant and animal for living healthy life. For example, in our daily meals we use fruits, vegetables, meat and other thing which comes from plants and animal. but as those natural thing which comes from animal and plants, we start using artificial food. those artificial food are causing various type of disease which is lowering lifespan of individual. Also, for other aspect of life e.g. clothing, sheltering we are dependable on animal and plant. So for better and improved life we need to make a balance between human and plant & animal, which required some investment for protection of animal and plants.
However, we can protect animal and plants with the basic steps like not to pollute forest, not doing any construction in forest and reserved area of animal and plants. With these precautionary action we can save animal and plants, which didn't required any extra-ordinary step.
we can conclude that preservation of animal and plant required some fundamental action and investment from our side. but no extraordinary step is needed for same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
we live in a place where existence of huma...
^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Human
...animal, insect and other living things. human, plants and animals sharing this living...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...care of animals and plants around us. we are very much dependable on the plant a...
^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ing which comes from plants and animal. but as those natural thing which comes from...
^^^
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
...plants, we start using artificial food. those artificial food are causing various typ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...on we can save animal and plants, which didnt required any extra-ordinary step. we ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...dnt required any extra-ordinary step. we can conclude that preservation of anima...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...al action and investment from our side. but no extraordinary step is needed for sam...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, may, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 271.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94464944649 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52015019531 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520295202952 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7037677396 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142241863096 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627864497869 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373095218054 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971628697592 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226397037556 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.