Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
The argument contains two counterparts, that some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education and others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. I believe that logical reasoning would do more to the foundation of education rather than just depending upon teaching morality to produce a structure of moral society, however, logical thinking and morality both plays important role in the establishment of a moral society.
Human has ability to think for themselves and others all well, which makes us different from other species. We can differentiate what is right or what is wrong. The difference of knowing what is moral or what's immoral comes by learning some basic principles of humanity. Therefore, everyone must learn the idea of morality for themselves and other. This morality must be learned by teaching logical reasoning. For example, if we commit crimes, we would be jailed or executed as well as committing crimes like taking one's life would be immoral act to do. Some people don't understand the simple moral principle but they understand the consequences of the immoral act and therefore hindered committing ill-act.
We living in a world were crimes are just a part of our lives. Many people conduct crimes and many become victims of those crimes. If everyone learn morality then would there be no crimes? No. Because teaching morality provides an concrete idea of what we are supposed to do. For example, we have tons of cases where people with high moral standards or people who teach morality commit plight crimes. However, teaching your child not to become too selfish, so that it doesn't hurt others would be necessary lesson.
However, we know that there are people who commit crimes by planning a crime. These criminals' thinking is logical, they know whatever they are doing is a crime and still they do it because that simply doesn't believe in morality
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... difference of knowing what is moral or whats immoral comes by learning some basic pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...would be immoral act to do. Some people dont understand the simple moral principle b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lity then would there be no crimes? No. Because teaching morality provides an concrete ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... No. Because teaching morality provides an concrete idea of what we are supposed t...
^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d not to become too selfish, so that it doesnt hurt others would be necessary lesson. ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nd still they do it because that simply doesnt believe in morality
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06769230769 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59567232002 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513846153846 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.4918708256 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520170445679 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164826736313 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199051238171 0.0758088955206 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325748195272 0.150359130593 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243761492683 0.0667264976115 365% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.