Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns

A society worth is living is the one that has a perfect blend of morality as well as rationality. We can never really keep one over the other. If a society has to bolster its influence, moral values and logical thinking, both play a vital role. Both are needed to mould the people of society into what is termed as "beautiful human beings". Not to forget the foundation is laid at a very early age. Starting from the time a child joins a kindergarten to the time he graduates from a University, several obstacles demand to either choose a moral way or a more logical way. The foundation of education is laid in schools and hence it is essential for the schools to help their children learn to choose when both morality and rationality become a question to them.

Well, if we have a very close look at this issue of morality and rationality, we'll find that both are very situation dependent. For instance, if you are a highly honored Government official and positioned such that various politicians or mafia try to lure or bribe you, that is where morality comes into play. Accepting any such nuisance would definitely be an ignoble act. Here, the foundation of morality supersedes rationality. But not wholly, if you monitor carefully moral action would definitely be rational too. On the other hand, if you consider a businessmen vieing a contract, his logical reasoning superseder moral

Hence, if given a chance to choose between morality and logical reasoning, I think morality is the one that comes in handy. A morally sound decision will always leave you free of any guilt of remorse. Blatantly, it is also possible that a morally sound decision has a considerable amount of logic associated with it. Now, how can we inculcate the moral values and what can be done to engender it in our everyday lives? Well, education is the primary step and rest all is secondary. After family, teachers, and professors are the people with whom a child shares a close bond. Hence, they can be pivotal in encouraging the children to take a stand, think for a while and take a decision that is coherent with their moral values. A scrupulous person always makes merry, sooner or later. His life has free of any burden that unscrupulous people generally tend to carry.

However, for creating a moral society, the most important qualities that are required are honesty, perseverance, generosity, kindness and many more. All these can be easily found in a person who has been brought up in an environment which taught him morality. His decisions may or may not be profitable but they will definitely not hamper the norms of a society and will always be inclined to maintain the peace and harmony of a society.

Not denying the fact that, both morality and logical reasoning are important to produce a moral society. But if asked to choose, morality will definitely have an upper hand and do the greater good.
We need people who follow principles and do think about other and not just about themselves. We need altrusitic individuals who are servile enough to take the society forward. Not only that, we need people who can take morally sound decisions and encourage other too to do the same. This is the only way how we can achieve our vision of a moral society, free of deceit and corruption.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a businessman' or simply 'businessmen'?
Suggestion: a businessman; businessmen
...too. On the other hand, if you consider a businessmen vieing a contract, his logical reasonin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, well, while, as to, for instance, i think, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77797202797 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69395270333 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482517482517 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 900.9 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8721145776 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276457958952 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712433397893 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483342136067 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149979640502 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379087875275 0.0667264976115 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.